Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 38 of 38

Thread: Irish History left to fill in on Wikipedia

  1. #31
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Self-imposed Exile
    Posts
    1,403

    Quote Originally Posted by CJH
    Quote Originally Posted by Rocky
    Cosgrave, Costello and Dev all had much the same position with the Catholic Church. They were all strongly Catholic, who took what the Catholic Church said very seriously, but at the same time were willing to go against the Catholic Church if they strongly disagreed with it and were more then willing to use the Catholic Church for political reasons at various times.
    Bascially I'd agree with that (though I don't know of any incident of Dev capitulating to the hierarchy a la Costello)

    My earlier post was not, as merriweather seemed to think, to suggest that Costello was a Catholic sectarian. It was simply to show that EOD's 'argument', that all was well in liberal secular Ireland under CnaG until nasty Catholic Dev came along and single handedly turned the state into a reactionary priest-ridden hellhole, is so much garbage. Dev, and his FG opponents, were men who fully reflected the prevailing ethos of the times.
    Before the 1932 General Election Archbishop McQuaid had approached Cosgrave about turning the GPO into a cathedral. He argued that every other predominatly European Catholic capital city had a cathedral on the main street and that so should Dublin. Cosgrave agreed. Then following the election result McQuaid hoped de Valera would agree as well but he refused. De Valera was opposed to the Knights of Columbanus, arguing that in a 95% Catholic state an organisation dedicated to advancing Catholic interests was superfluous but many in FG, and indeed Labour, were Knights throughout the 1930s and 40s.

    Throughout the same period de Valera was attacked as being Jewish by FG propagandists, together with being Mexican, Spanish or a half-breed among others, who sought to play on religion to increase their political support. Indeed how FF and de Valera were not in hock with the Church is demonstrated simply in how the Mother and Child Scheme was enacted by Jim Ryan in 1951, almost unchanged from what Browne proposed and with his support, whereas the Knights of Columbanus and the doctors in FG and Labour brought it down. Could also easily point to how Frank Aiken didn't care about excommunication over the admission of China to the UN Security Council and how de Valera , largely, helped end the Fethard-on-Se boycott which was incidentally supported by Brendan Corish, a Knight of Columbanus.
    "Everyone hates Fianna Fáil except the electorate."

    Unattributed correspondent, 1960s.

  2. #32
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    16,455

    Quote Originally Posted by thegeneral
    Quote Originally Posted by CJH
    Quote Originally Posted by Rocky
    Cosgrave, Costello and Dev all had much the same position with the Catholic Church. They were all strongly Catholic, who took what the Catholic Church said very seriously, but at the same time were willing to go against the Catholic Church if they strongly disagreed with it and were more then willing to use the Catholic Church for political reasons at various times.
    Bascially I'd agree with that (though I don't know of any incident of Dev capitulating to the hierarchy a la Costello)

    My earlier post was not, as merriweather seemed to think, to suggest that Costello was a Catholic sectarian. It was simply to show that EOD's 'argument', that all was well in liberal secular Ireland under CnaG until nasty Catholic Dev came along and single handedly turned the state into a reactionary priest-ridden hellhole, is so much garbage. Dev, and his FG opponents, were men who fully reflected the prevailing ethos of the times.
    Before the 1932 General Election Archbishop McQuaid had approached Cosgrave about turning the GPO into a cathedral. He argued that every other predominatly European Catholic capital city had a cathedral on the main street and that so should Dublin. Cosgrave agreed. Then following the election result McQuaid hoped de Valera would agree as well but he refused. De Valera was opposed to the Knights of Columbanus, arguing that in a 95% Catholic state an organisation dedicated to advancing Catholic interests was superfluous but many in FG, and indeed Labour, were Knights throughout the 1930s and 40s.

    Throughout the same period de Valera was attacked as being Jewish by FG propagandists, together with being Mexican, Spanish or a half-breed among others, who sought to play on religion to increase their political support. Indeed how FF and de Valera were not in hock with the Church is demonstrated simply in how the Mother and Child Scheme was enacted by Jim Ryan in 1951, almost unchanged from what Browne proposed and with his support, whereas the Knights of Columbanus and the doctors in FG and Labour brought it down. Could also easily point to how Frank Aiken didn't care about excommunication over the admission of China to the UN Security Council and how de Valera , largely, helped end the Fethard-on-Se boycott which was incidentally supported by Brendan Corish, a Knight of Columbanus.
    Or you could point to McQuaid and his influence on the 1937 constitutiuon.
    Or you could point to Dev stating he would employ a Catholic over a Protestant regardinng the Mayo librarian issue.
    And heck, if you want to be mean about his nationality, you could point to he himself playing the Mexican/half breed card to get out of being executed in 1916, couldn't you?

  3. #33
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Self-imposed Exile
    Posts
    1,403

    Quote Originally Posted by meriwether
    Or you could point to McQuaid and his influence on the 1937 constitutiuon.
    Or you could point to Dev stating he would employ a Catholic over a Protestant regardinng the Mayo librarian issue.
    And heck, if you want to be mean about his nationality, you could point to he himself playing the Mexican/half breed card to get out of being executed in 1916, couldn't you?
    Cardinal McRory said the Constitution wasn't Catholic enough. The pope refused to say he supported it. Kind of indicates that they weren't exactly overjoyed with the document. Neither was McQuaid, you read Cooney's biography of him recently anyhow so you should remember that.

    The librarian card is a very silly to play. Do you even know the person's name and gender?

    Him playing the card in 1916, weak Meriwether, very weak. Worthy of WhiteHorse, Earl of Desmond, other twisted FGers and FF haters. Thought you were better than that. You're chances of a gold star this weak are very slim now.
    "Everyone hates Fianna Fáil except the electorate."

    Unattributed correspondent, 1960s.

  4. #34
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    16,455

    Quote Originally Posted by thegeneral
    Quote Originally Posted by meriwether
    Or you could point to McQuaid and his influence on the 1937 constitutiuon.
    Or you could point to Dev stating he would employ a Catholic over a Protestant regardinng the Mayo librarian issue.
    And heck, if you want to be mean about his nationality, you could point to he himself playing the Mexican/half breed card to get out of being executed in 1916, couldn't you?
    Cardinal McRory said the Constitution wasn't Catholic enough. The pope refused to say he supported it. Kind of indicates that they weren't exactly overjoyed with the document. Neither was McQuaid, you read Cooney's biography of him recently anyhow so you should remember that.

    The librarian card is a very silly to play. Do you even know the person's name and gender?

    Him playing the card in 1916, weak Meriwether, very weak. Worthy of WhiteHorse, Earl of Desmond, other twisted FGers and FF haters. Thought you were better than that. You're chances of a gold star this weak are very slim now.
    Whats silly about the librarian card? I find it somewhat interesting that Dev would feel he should be impelled to employ a Catholic before a Protestant. In the context, I can only wonder at your motive for deeming it irrelevant.
    As for the 1916 thing, he cant really complain about someone making a fuss about his nationality, can he?
    I have read Cooneys book. McQuaids access to Dev was impressive. I dont think he looked on him so kindly only because they were 'Rock old boys.
    Anyhow, lets not even begin to talk about him signing the book of condolences for Hitler.
    Waaayy too controversial.

  5. #35
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    2,380

    Quote Originally Posted by meriwether
    Anyhow, lets not even begin to talk about him signing the book of condolences for Hitler.
    Waaayy too controversial.
    It hardly compares with Costello saying that "the blueshirts will be victorious in the Irish Free State" just as "the blackshirts were victorious in Italy" and the "Hitlershirts" were victorious in Germany!

    But then the Blueshirts weren't fascists. As Joe Lee wrote

    "Fascism was far too intellectually demanding for the bulk of the blueshirts......the shirt and salute marked the summit of their ideological achievement."
    There was pleasure in paradise, but no excitement - Milan Kundera

  6. #36
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    16,455

    Quote Originally Posted by DSCH
    Quote Originally Posted by meriwether
    Anyhow, lets not even begin to talk about him signing the book of condolences for Hitler.
    Waaayy too controversial.
    It hardly compares with Costello saying that "the blueshirts will be victorious in the Irish Free State" just as "the blackshirts were victorious in Italy" and the "Hitlershirts" were victorious in Germany!

    But then the Blueshirts weren't fascists. As Joe Lee wrote

    "Fascism was far too intellectually demanding for the bulk of the blueshirts......the shirt and salute marked the summit of their ideological achievement."
    Does it not compare? Really?

  7. #37
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    2,380

    Quote Originally Posted by meriwether
    Quote Originally Posted by DSCH
    Quote Originally Posted by meriwether
    Anyhow, lets not even begin to talk about him signing the book of condolences for Hitler.
    Waaayy too controversial.
    It hardly compares with Costello saying that "the blueshirts will be victorious in the Irish Free State" just as "the blackshirts were victorious in Italy" and the "Hitlershirts" were victorious in Germany!

    But then the Blueshirts weren't fascists. As Joe Lee wrote

    "Fascism was far too intellectually demanding for the bulk of the blueshirts......the shirt and salute marked the summit of their ideological achievement."
    Does it not compare? Really?
    Not in the comedy stakes!
    There was pleasure in paradise, but no excitement - Milan Kundera

  8. #38
    Politics.ie Newbie
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    16

    I see no mention of Joe Satriani in that verison of Irish history. Bah. Humbug.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 58
    Last Post: 23rd April 2009, 07:14 PM
  2. Replies: 35
    Last Post: 9th March 2009, 09:18 PM
  3. Irish history articles on Wikipedia
    By evercloserunion in forum History
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 6th June 2007, 12:04 AM
  4. The last writhings of a society left beached by history
    By UnrepentantFenian in forum Current Affairs
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 16th September 2005, 09:39 AM