DAVID THORNLEY'S DEATH is as great a loss as Seamus Costello's murder.
Of course this has generally been ignored. The obituaries commemmorate David as Don and television pundit. His terminal sickness is ascribed to disilluusion with the dirty world of politics. His eventual radicalism is considered to have been an abheration caused by this illlness.
In fact, in his last Irish Times article, David portrayed himself accurately as Hamlet. Like Hamlet he had two conflicting personae: the radical intellecctual and the academic establishmentarian. To his credit, he ended by supporting the first against the second. In doing so, he destroyed himself.
<Mod> Please do not post copyright protected material to the site. A link and a short extract are generally sufficient. </Mod>
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
With 2016 only four years away,a debate for a Socialist Republic is clearly necessary.With the Labour Party so far away from the ideals of Connolly,Sinn Féin not making much headway on re-unification,the 'left' more fractured than ever,perhaps a look back into the roots of the 'splits' is necessary.David Thornley was a controversial figure,but he believed in the unity of the left.He believed it was the only way to acheive re-unification,and tried to the best of his abilitys to advocate the politics of James Connolly as the only way forward for the working class.Or as Connolly himself said-'Through Socialism alone can the salvation of Ireland come'.Perhaps lessons can be learned from the journey of the Socialist Labour Party.



9Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote