LinkBack URL
About LinkBackswhere is this published or is it moreOriginally Posted by Destiny's Soldier
quack quack quack
where is this published or is it more
quack quack quack
Not being smart, but when the Supreme Court approved the use of fluoridation in the water supply years ago, how, exactly, would one go about suing the State for said same use.
That would only become a live issue if they now ignored a decision of the ECJ which indicated that it was prohibited.
"......... we must sometimes listen to those who, consumed with zeal, have scant judgment or balance. To such ones the modern world is nothing but betrayal and ruin.........We feel bound to disagree with these prophets of doom who are forever forecasting calamity -- as though the world's end were imminent."
Fluoride chemicals added to public water supplies, boosts lead absorption in lab animals' bones, teeth and blood, report Sawan, et al. (Toxicology 2/2010). Earlier studies already show children's blood-lead-levels are higher in fluoridated communities, reports Sawan's research team.
"…exposure to increased amounts of lead and fluoride occurs at about the same age (1-3 years)… Therefore, this is a critical time when systemic exposure to fluoride should be minimized since fluoride may increase lead accumulation," the researchers caution.
Low-level lead exposure is associated with lower IQ, ADHD and many health and behavior ailments.
Fluosilicic acid (fluoride) is added to water supplies ostensibly to reduce tooth decay.
Sawan's team put fluosilicic acid, with and without lead, into lab animals' drinking water. They found more lead in tooth enamel, surface bone, whole bone, and tooth dentine in rats co-exposed to fluoride and lead.
Fluoride chemicals may increase lead accumulation, say researchers
we need to get this poison out of our water NOW!
Fluoride has long enjoyed a sterling public image as “proven cavity fighter,” bone builder and essential nutrient. The fact of the matter is that it is none of these things, but rather one of the most toxic elements on earth, capable of causing the very problems it is touted to solve. This fact has been widely and successfully concealed for more than half a century, in large part because of an overwhelmingly successful disinformation campaign launched by industrial polluters who infiltrated and lobbied government, controlling and influencing its policies over the years.
The toxicity of fluoride is no secret in scientific circles. According to the Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products, fluoride is more toxic than lead and just slightly less toxic than arsenic1 (first chart), one of the most toxic substances known. How, then, did the level of fluoride permitted in our public water supply get to be more than 250 times the level permitted of lead?
Protected Pollutant
show the published paper or else its quack quack
Reply With Quote