A champion of the people emerges with the age-old and appealing promise of "something for nothing" - to be financed through every-increasing taxes. Supply and demand are thrown out of gear - the overhead goes up; the effective use of human energy goes down; the standard of living is lowered because money cannot buy wealth that is not produced.
WEAVER, HENRY GRADY,
No, it is not new. We always had social insurance expenditure. There is no new expenditure. The expenditure was financed on a paygo basis so it was funded from current receipts not from some magic purse in the sky. What, pray tell, is the nature of this "new bill" you talk about? What money will have to be spent that was not spent before or would not have been spent if there was still a working balance in the fund?
The revised estimates published today contain a lot of interesting figures re the SIF:
They are estimating the revenue from PRSI payments will be down €500million despite having increased the employee/self employed ceiling from €53k to €75k. They have clearly started to recognise that the economy is going to lose 150k+ jobs this year and that private sector incomes are falling rapidly. Although you have to wonder if a fall of €500million will be enough of an allowance;
They are expecting a deficit in the SIF for 2009 of €2.75billion;
And a year end carry over into 2010 of a €650million surplus.
Even accepting this scenario as correct this means that the SIF will run dry around March 2010 and the taxpayer will need to find an extra circa €2billion from somewhere to fund the 2010 SIF deficit - €2billion that the taxpayer just does not have nor money markets are likely to lend!