Register to Comment
Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 55
Like Tree35Likes
  1. #1
    Destiny's Soldier Destiny's Soldier is offline
    Destiny's Soldier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    4,260

    GSK reports 6- in-1 Vaccine can cause Autism and Death



    A devastasting report from The European Citizen's Initiative, (Initiative Citoyenne) details of the potential horrors of GSK's Infanrix 6-in-1 Vaccine. An internal GSK document marked Confidential usually reserved for regulatory bodies only, the 1,271 page document details the adverse effects associated with the vaccine over a 2 year period.

    Infanrix is used in Ireland by the HSE for Infants with repeated doses at 2, 4 and 6 months. It is intended to protect newborns and infants from six different illnesses: Diphtheria, Tetanus, Whooping Cough, Polio, Haemophilius Influenza B (HIB) and Hepatitis B.

    The GSK document in question details the adverse effects of this vaccine, reported back to the manufacturer from various European countries between the 23rd of October 2009 and the 22nd of October 2011.

    GSK received 1,742 reports of adverse effects, of which 503 were serious effects not listed and 56 were serious adverse effects listed.The events registered included 36 deaths (over the two-years period), most of which occurred within three days after the child received the Infanrix Hexa vaccine.

    Adverse events include autism, encephalitis, heart failure, gaze palsy (indicative of neurological damage), gastrointestinal hemorrhage, jaundice, mental retardation (classed as not serious!), removal of part of the intestine (also defined as not serious!), opisthotonos (yet again labeled as not serious!), paralysis. Guillain Barré syndrome, convulsions, and many others.

    Of course, not all the reported events were actually caused by Infanrix. GSK reported that the number of reported adverse events was only 14.6 per 100,000 doses distributed (not per 100,000 administered). However, as reported by Initiative Citoyenne, the doctors’ publication, Revue française du Practicien, reports that this figure is likely only 1-10% of the reality.

    So you think the above figures are not correct?

    See links here:

    http://ddata.over-blog.com/xxxyyy/3/...-6--12--12.pdf

    http://ddata.over-blog.com/3/27/09/7...013/confid.pdf

    Homepage - European Citizens' Initiative - European Commission

    So what will the HSE do about this data? Probably ignore it and watch infants suffer irreversible damage or even pay with their lives more likely.

    The BMJ Medical Journal Re: Belief not science is behind flu jab promotion, new report says | BMJ reports that:

    "At the end of the document, we can see that several comments (of physicians but also of national regulatory agencies like Italian one) establish a possible or likely link between the death and the vaccine. We noticed a very abnormal temporal distribution of the deaths, with a clear concentration of the fatal outcomes in the first days (or hours) after vaccination, most often delivered with concomitant others, like Prevenar/Synflorix or Roratix/Rotateq

    This kind of document shows clearly the urgent need of real comparative studies with real placebos. We must dare comparing what it is comparable: vaccinated with completely unvaccinated children, because it is the only method that is really a scientific one! We cannot accept any longer inconsistent pretexts claiming that it is impossible because it would be "unethical". What is the most unethical of all is carry on exposing various generations to insufficiently assessed (=experimental) products!!"

    This is where is all gets worse with the use of other vaccines in combination with Infanrix:

    http://ddata.over-blog.com/3/27/09/7...revenar-13.pdf

    "On the 4th of January 2013, at the end of the required 6-week period, two Pfizer group Regulatory Affairs Directors, Mary Allin and Helen Edwards, sent a response to Dr. S. Spinosa of the European Medicine Agency on the topic of “higher number of neurologic events reported in Italy following the co-administration of Prevenar 13 and Infanrix hexavalent vaccines”.

    What will be done about this?

    Nothing absolutely nothing. Line up and take your shot.

    Sign in or Register Now to reply

  2. #2
    slippy wicket slippy wicket is offline
    slippy wicket's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    5,508

    Enough with the scaremongering Wakefieldite BS.
    Sign in or Register Now to reply

  3. #3
    Samell Samell is offline

    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    1,391

    GSK another vaccine with problems? Narcolepsy with the bird flu, now this, are they actually a safe company or just out to make money for the share holders?
    Sign in or Register Now to reply

  4. #4
    Dan_Murphy Dan_Murphy is offline
    Dan_Murphy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    4,103

    Sign in or Register Now to reply

  5. #5
    seabhcan seabhcan is offline
    seabhcan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    24,024

    So 1700 adverse conditions recorded within 3 days of getting the vaccine, with a rate of 14.6 per 100,000.

    That means they vaccinated 12 million kids and 1700 had some adverse effect within 3 days.

    Of the 12 million, 36 died within 3 days.

    Now... if you took any group of 12 million kids, how many would you expect to have died, statistically, in any 3 day period? All these kids are under 1 year old, right.

    From wikipedia, the mortality rate for under 1 year olds is 1/1000 in western countries.

    So for 12 million under 1's, 12,000 will die in their first year (assuming all 12 million are in the west). Thats 32 per day. For any 3 day period, 100 of the 12 million kids will die.

    However, most under 1's that die, will die soon after birth, so it skews the stats. The first vaccine dose is given at 3 months. So the real stats we need are the death rate of 3month-12month age group.

    I don't know what that is. But it is certainly in the region of the numbers reported in the OP's study.

    For any group of 12 million under 1 year olds you would expect to see 36 or more die with 3 days of any particular event - its unlikely the vaccine had any impact - and it may actually reduce the death rate vs. non vaccinated kids.
    Last edited by seabhcan; 27th January 2013 at 11:35 AM.
    Sign in or Register Now to reply

  6. #6
    Barroso Barroso is offline

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    3,472

    This link
    PLOS Medicine: Neonatal Mortality Levels for 193 Countries in 2009 with Trends since 1990: A Systematic Analysis of Progress, Projections, and Priorities
    gives European neonatal death rate (under 1 month) as being 10.7 per thousand in Europe, which I think is the relevant area in this study.
    It might be of help in understanding the figures here.
    Sign in or Register Now to reply

  7. #7
    Cruimh Cruimh is offline
    Cruimh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    101,088

    All vaccines can cause death.

    As for the thread title - that is BS.
    Sign in or Register Now to reply

  8. #8
    Clanrickard Clanrickard is offline
    Clanrickard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    40,970

    Zoo.
    Sign in or Register Now to reply

  9. #9
    CHUCK FAGAN CHUCK FAGAN is offline
    CHUCK FAGAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    180

    I lost complete interest in this when the two American Magicians spoke..............
    Sign in or Register Now to reply

  10. #10
    Clanrickard Clanrickard is offline
    Clanrickard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    40,970

    Dysentery's Soldier with yet another conspiracy nut thread. Must be cold up in that bunker in the mountain's.
    Sign in or Register Now to reply

Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Sign in to CommentRegister to Comment