Register to Comment
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 34
Like Tree24Likes
  1. #1
    PUFF DADDY PUFF DADDY is offline
    PUFF DADDY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    3,738

    Why is there still a ban on donating blood here, if you lived in the UK between 1980 -1996 for over a year ?

    I used to donate blood from when I turned 18, it was a done thing in our Family, I went off to London for 5yrs and returned in 95 and again started to give blood, until there was a scare re mad cow's disease over in the UK and there was a ban put in place for anyone who lived for a yr or more in the UK from '80 to '96 as per attached.

    http://www.giveblood.ie/Become_a_Don...ood_donors.pdf

    What I can't understand, what about the UK, what "precautions" are taken to "screen" for mad cows if any on those that donate blood over there ?

    Is this ban still necessary, I am sure there are plenty of folk like myself that would gladly donate if this ban was lifted.

    Thoughts ?
    Sign in or Register Now to reply

  2. #2
    Tin Foil Hat Tin Foil Hat is offline
    Tin Foil Hat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    3,385

    The simple answer it that they would rather a person die due to lack of blood than accept the minuscule possibility that that person would survive, contract mad-cow, and sue them.
    Sign in or Register Now to reply

  3. #3
    Angler Angler is offline

    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    458

    Given the freedom and frequency of travel between the two jurisdictions , I can't see the point in it . How many weren't resident , but regularly attended sporting and music events,did they abstain from eating the deadly burgers and pies .
    Sign in or Register Now to reply

  4. #4
    Con Gallagher Con Gallagher is offline

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    2,778

    I presume it's to ensure confidence in the blood bank? (Which I also assume is the reason for excluding men who have slept with men). I doubt if either can be justified on medical opinion.
    Sign in or Register Now to reply

  5. #5
    Didimus Didimus is offline

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    7,687
    Sign in or Register Now to reply

  6. #6
    Gibby Gibby is offline
    Gibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    754

    Quote Originally Posted by Tin Foil Hat View Post
    The simple answer it that they would rather a person die due to lack of blood than accept the minuscule possibility that that person would survive, contract mad-cow, and sue them.
    Any chance of a source for this emotive and apparently bitter comment???

    To put my own cards on the 'table' though - I have given blood over 90 times to date so this restriction has not affected my ability to donate.
    Sign in or Register Now to reply

  7. #7
    Interista Interista is offline
    Interista's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    7,567

    Quote Originally Posted by Tin Foil Hat View Post
    The simple answer it that they would rather a person die due to lack of blood than accept the minuscule possibility that that person would survive, contract mad-cow, and sue them.
    I think this is it in a nutshell.

    I have a friend who used to work for the Blood Bank (or whatever they're calling themselves these days). She told me it was widely acknowledged among staff that their restrictions on doners were ridiculously strict, and that there was also an unreasonably high number ofl 'non-bleds' ie people who turn up hoping to donate but are turned away. That's happened to me on more than one occasion: reasons include having been in a (very borderline) 'malarial' area in the previous year or having had an (again very borderline) low iron content in my blood. My friend reckoned that everyone at the Blood Bank knew this was just over caution on their part. They're still reeling from the Hepatitis B scandal, and don't want anything of the type happening again.
    Sign in or Register Now to reply

  8. #8
    Angler Angler is offline

    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    458

    Quote Originally Posted by Gibby View Post
    Any chance of a source for this emotive and apparently bitter comment???

    To put my own cards on the 'table' though - I have given blood over 90 times to date so this restriction has not affected my ability to donate.
    Michael Noonan could probably fill you in on that one .
    Sign in or Register Now to reply

  9. #9
    Samell Samell is offline

    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    1,391

    Turned away countless times myself due to travel, medication, and living in UK between the banned years.
    Surely there are parts of the blood unaffected by the bugs, medication or burgers that could be used even for research into looking for a test for BSE/CJD.

    I have often heard stories of operations cancelled due to lack of blood, Certan Death v million to one shot of potential death? Hmmmm no brainer really.

    Mark it research or emergency only.
    Sign in or Register Now to reply

  10. #10
    Tin Foil Hat Tin Foil Hat is offline
    Tin Foil Hat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    3,385

    Quote Originally Posted by Gibby View Post
    Any chance of a source for this emotive and apparently bitter comment???
    Yea, It's in their mission statement
    Of course I don't have a source. But this policy is quite obviously put in place by bean-counters.
    Sign in or Register Now to reply

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Sign in to CommentRegister to Comment