"First of all no woman becomes a prostitute unless she is a product of a broken home, conditioned by sexual abuse, a junkie or a drunk who is in debt, subject to a violent and abusive spouse or boyfriend or has been kidnapped and trafficked. Companies that sprang up after the legalisation of prostitution would not advertise for recruits in university campuses during job fairs. If you were employing prostitutes you would have to use violence to force them to sleep with a half dozen men a day - there's no other way a woman would sleep with a half dozen men a day no matter how much she was paid. To run a brothel requires a pimp and the use of violence."
You have part of the picture but not the whole schema.
It is true that there is a correlation between those who have been abused or been in care and prostitution. But not all prostitutes have been in care or previously abused.
It is true that junkies will prostitute themselves but not all prostitutes are junkies.
Some prostitutes support a pimp but not all prostitutes do so.
Some pimps are violent but all rely on emotional manipulation.
We have no reliable figures on what percentage of prostitutes are coerced and subject to violent control. We really do not know and that includes you.
In fact many Brothels are run by women and some on a collective basis.
"there's no other way a woman would sleep with a half dozen men a day no matter how much she was paid." Why do you think you can be so definite about that?
I think prostitution is never without some emotional/mental cost to the prostitute and I would not wish any of the women in my family to do that for a living. However if you think no woman ever becomes a prostitute willingly you are quite mistaken. As that's the case a civilised state would offer the protection of the law to those who choose to do so.
By this time it may be clear that I have done some work on this issue and although it was a few years ago I doubt much has changed.



281Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote