During the Blitz in 1940, the Queen was asked by the government to leave Buckingham Palace, and live in the countryside for her own safety. Her response was that if she did so, she could no longer look the people of the East End in the eye.Originally Posted by Sailor
Firstly, it is not a valid comparison - secondly, it might be preferable for him to remain outside the state and discharge his duties from there. Do I want him in the trenches getting in the way of professional soldiers? NO
"Elite - a small superior group; esp one that has a power out of proportion to its size." (Oxford English Dictionary)
The majority cannot therefore be the elite.
The husband is with her too??
What the hell is going on here?
Who is paying for the husband?
The state. I thought we were broke?
Ah, there go the Blueshirts again - hankering after the good old days of empire
Eh?Ah, there go the Blueshirts again - hankering after the good old days of empire
"Elite - a small superior group; esp one that has a power out of proportion to its size." (Oxford English Dictionary)
The majority cannot therefore be the elite.
We voted in the govt to appoint an accountable person responsible for health. You are saying she is not responsible, fine, then she should come home, resign, give up her fat pension and pay back every penny she earned as a TD.
She is responsible for health policy and strategy - not for operational matters. What happened in the Tallaght case comes under operational management.
But she could look them in the eye while living in luxury while they lived in poverty? And you do mean Queen Elizabeth or are you British.
Maybe she'll get a nice haircut, down under.
Blueshirt - more what you might call west-brit
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote