You said it, not me. However, we could speculate: suppose vaccinations are 10% responsible for the rise in those diseases. Is there reason to think that is possible? There certainly is! Does the medical establishment want to investigate that possibility? Certainly not.
It's no theory; it's a fact. No vaccine is actually needed. And all vaccines produce nasty side effects.And if your theory, as I understyand it, is that Big Pharma are making big bucks on the basis of unneeded vaccines...
I thought it was obvious:... what is the motivation for actually causing the likes of obesity and autism? If the motivation is simply money, why not just make vaccines largely harmless? Why do they want to cause obesity and autism?
It is not in the interests of Big Pharma to prevent common diseases. Quite the opposite in fact. The maintenance and expansion of diseases is a precondition for the financial growth of the industry; improving human health is not its driving force.
The huge profits of the pharmaceutical industry are based on the patenting of new drugs and vaccines.
The marketplace for the pharmaceutical industry is the human body, but only for as long as the body hosts diseases.
Would you not agree?



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote