I know that. And yes the endless whining about politicians' pay can be annoying, though you and I know that from the days when politicians were grossly underpaid, thanks to McCreevy it went to the other extreme.
You and I both know that the original concept of a ministerial pension was kosher. It was to stop guys with experience when they left government when their party lost power leaving politics for the private sector, and so meaning you constantly lost people with experience. It wasn't a pension at all in a normal sense. It was in effect a graduated pay scale so that the more experience you had the more you got paid rather than be lured away from politics. But when McCreevy changed the payment system and made it very financially worthwhile to stay in, these 'pensions' should have been abolished. But instead he created a new way to incrementalise the pay scale based on experience, yet kept the old incremental system in place as well, which was, well, dumb.
But the thing is that you and I both are in a position to know the truth about politicians' pay. Most people here aren't and no little more than the lies in the media. As a journalist colleague once joked to me, "we are not in the business of telling the truth. We are in the business of stirring up sh1t!". A lot of people here actually believe what they read in newspapers, particularly tabloids.
You could have explained why his original post was wrong. But snapping his head off wasn't the best idea.



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote