They talk up a storm against Israel. But that's all it is. It sounds good, plays well with the masses and allows them to let off steam. But these states often recognize that other Islamic states are even more dangerous to them than Israel. Who fought the biggest war in the Middle East, dwarfing the Israeli wars? Iran and Iraq. Who did Iraq invade? Kuwait.Who fought alongside the Americans in the first Gulf War? Syria, Saudi Arabia, the gulf states. Who fought the biggest civil wars? Lebanon:Palestinian against Druze against Maronite against Shia against Sunni etc; Jordan:Bedouin against palestinian;Syria:Secular Goverment against Islamists; Iraq:Sunni against Shia and Kurd;Islamists against secularists. And so on. For people whio "loathe" Israel more than anything, they display a good appetite for fighting each other.
Last edited by IvoShandor; 16th June 2009 at 03:34 PM.
Good piece from Michael Totten here:
Commentary Blog Archive The Third Worldists Are Back
P.I will never forget the similar line peddled about Lebanese in March and April of 2005. I was there when the “March 14” revolution was in full swing, and I heard from even some Western expats who lived in Beirut that the demonstrators were mostly liberal and “bourgeois” Christians from the “Gucci” class.
It was wrong, and it was contemptible. What ignited that revolution was the assassination of a Sunni prime minister. Around a million people – more than a fourth of the entire country – demonstrated in Martyr’s Square and demanded the ouster of the occupying Syrian military dictatorship. There aren’t a million liberal “bourgeois” Christians in all of Lebanon. In any case, the Christians as a community have proven themselves far less reliably anti-Syrian and anti-Hezbollah than the Sunnis.
The Westerners I’ve met personally who believe and write this sort of thing suffer from a condescending Third Worldism and a barely concealed contempt for Middle Eastern people whom they don’t think are “authentic.” Arabs and Muslims (and presumably now Persians) aren’t supposed to hate terrorists or yearn for democracy like Americans do. They’re supposed to be in thrall to “resistance” and every other morally and politically bankrupt ideology that attracted the afflicted expats to the region in the first place.
"Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better."
As I've posted regularly against NWO claptrap, your attempt to answer for me is appreciated, but widely off the mark.
If you are suggesting that there isn't US interference in middle eastern politics, then I'm afraid that sounds sounds more like deliberate obtuseness than silliness.
The Iranian people have as has been pointed out here comprehensively messed around for decades. Speaking for myself, I've said plenty about theocratic dictatorships. Why would would "lefties" support governments who hang communists and trade unionists?
The person quoted is Laura Secor, not Michael Totten. I read some of her material yesterday. It was light weight, anecdotal, and related only to her middleclass acquaintances.
Her expat friends were the source there too. Straw men here: no one has posted on the Lebanon in this thread.I heard from even some Western expats who lived in Beirut that the demonstrators were mostly liberal and “bourgeois” Christians from the “Gucci” class.
This is not going to be the end of the Mullahs at all. What may happen is that Kohmeni could be kicked out and replaced by Grand Ayatullah Husayn 'Ali Montazeri. He is a moderate and popular with the youth.
?????? ?? ????? Views from the Occident: Grand Ayatullah Montazeri Calls on 'Youth' to 'Claim their Rights' Peacefully & with 'Patience & Restraint'
There are more rumours that the army is meeting in private and considering their position. According to VOA, 16 or so Sepah (revolutionary Guard Officers) were arrested by the police. One of them told VOA that they were in contact with Russia for a military coup.
The other Conservative Candidate Rezai is apparently using his contacts with the revolutionary Guards to try and stop them attacking the protesters.
A recount would be a sham. If they didn't count the votes the first time, why should we expect them to count them this time? Mousavi is the President of Iran.
Iran Updates (VIDEO): Live-Blogging The Uprising
"...Money exists not by nature but by law." Aristotle (Ethics, 1133)
Er, no - it's Totten, who in turn quotes Secor, but I only quoted his words.
No straw-man; he points out that the same "protesters are just yuppies" argument was used by the anti-imperialist hard-left about Lebanon; it's just being rehashed about Iran by people who never been anywhere near the region, or refuse to acknowledge the videoed scenes of nurses and bin-men protesting.Straw men here: no one has posted on the Lebanon in this thread.
P.
Last edited by oceanclub; 16th June 2009 at 05:48 PM.
"Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better."
Utter (utter) rubbish. You neglect to mention Irans sponsorship of Hezzbollah and indeed Hamas. Perhaps due to your weirdly Western perspective that there is no political divide between Shia and Sunni in the middle east and Iran is not a deft hand a manipulating that. Those groups are not alone in recieving sponsorship from Iran in the Middle East - so Irans "involvement" in funding dissident and terrorist groups beyond its borders far outweights any influance other nations (even combined) have within Iran.
The argument that Iran is somehow more democratis that its Arab neighbours (an arguement made often on P.ie) is now proven to be a falacy also.
You also cite US backing for Jundullah as fact, when all you have ever been able to cite is old evidance that is shakey at best and irrelivent to the current situaion in either Pakistan or Iran. As a matter a fact your evidance is flatly contradicted by the facts on the ground currently. Why would the US for instance want to destabilise a region that it relies on as its only land supply route into Afghanistan? Your evidence lies in the claims of Ahmedinjad, which have never been substanciated. Tortured suspects that confess to US involvement before being hanged hardly constitutes evidence does it?
You would accuse the US of encouraging the supressoing and killing of Muslims. Yet you yourself have proven more than willing to support just that.
If you are to take regimes claims at face value, then on balance Iran again comes out worse. Its alledged involvement in Iraq has cost American lives and the lives of thousands of Iraqis. There has been no recipricol action against Iran. There is also a question mark over its links to the Taliban now, that defunct regime now it seems proves useful to Irans counter productive foreign policy.
In short you have no good reason to believe the word of a regime that has proven itself to be false and misleading in both word and deed. The recent events in Iran prove that the Iranian regime in its current form does not even represent the people of Iran.
And while you are at it answer me this: You said in a previous post that "Islam is the only answer" in relation to Iran. Which strand of Islam? Shia or Sunni? Please don't provide me with the usual fudge that Muj used to serve up when confronted with the stark facts about the Middle East. It served only to prove his ignorance not only about politics but Islam itself.
Last edited by Thac0man; 16th June 2009 at 06:26 PM.
The police have arrested some Basiji (Ahmadinejad's thugs) who were shooting at protesters. The ordinary Police are have all apparently been unarmed. There is speculation that the Government does not trust them.
Doctors and Nurses are protesting in Tehran. They say that Hezbollah Arabs were beating and killing protesters.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oyirzlCO-FA]YouTube - 16 JUNE 2009 - Doctors and nurses are protesting in a major hospital in Tehran - Iran[/ame]
A cleric from the city of Qom has said that the citie's clerics are behin Mousavi.
Bloody Day on Iran's Streets - WSJ.com
The US Government is working with twitter to ensure that the service, which is of great help to the Iranian protesters, does not go down.
Anderson Cooper 360: Blog Archive - State Department to Twitter: Keep Iranian tweets coming - Blogs from CNN.com
The BBC website has gone green in solidarity with the democracy protests in Iran. May just be a coincidence as it regularly changes colour, but you never know.
BBC - Homepage
Iran has banned foreign media from reporting anything from the country.]
Iran cancels foreign media accreditation | Reuters
Khamenyi appears to have backtracked in last few minutes. He now appears to be saying that the election was fine and that the protesters should accept it.
Last edited by Kensington; 16th June 2009 at 08:30 PM.
"...Money exists not by nature but by law." Aristotle (Ethics, 1133)
OH FFS, this revolution is officially uncool now, and simultaneously the BBC loses all objectivity on the reporting of the event. Well done the beeb.The BBC website has gone green in solidarity with the democracy protests in Iran.
BBC - Homepage
What the hell is with all these revolutions having colours? Does it mean its a revolution we should agree with? I'm actually starting to think the US had to have helped this on now. Oh well it could have been good...
*************, *********, ********, **** <3 USA
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.