All right, maybe I'm the last person to notice that he is a spook. It is so common in US administration that I suppose it shouldn't be a surprise. I still feel angry on behalf of the millions of people who thought they were voting for something else.
Sorry about the bad link on Obama's first job.
Barack Obama's CIA Employment [Archive] - Forums of Pravda.Ru
He went on to work for the Annenberg Foundation and similar.
I must admit I'm not bothered about the birth cert one way or another: the other items I do have a problem with. What can a nice, genuine person possibly have to hide about their college time ? All the other candidates released theirs.
With Obama, during the campaign journalists on the right went ferretting about trying to find stuff to discredit him. There was a nasty campaign that attempted to cast him as being Moslem (apparently a no no) or far left, in touch with former terrorists.
Most people who wanted Bush out understandably viewed all this stuff as smear tactics. The left consequently spent very little time looking to see who this guy was. On the one hand, someone with simplistic populist slogans is always a bit worrying and on the other hand, such a nice looking guy, who people wanted to be genuinely up for a change from the horrors of the Bush period. At the same time, US commentators clearly described him as to the right of Clinton and it was well known that he was funded by big business as well as small internet donations.
I started reading about Obama a week ago. His life is full of big gaps he won't explain. He went from Brzezinski's mentorship in the sovietology course to BIC.
His mother worked for the Ford Foundation, USAID and the World Bank. She left Obama with his grandparents when he was a teenager. Obama's father, who also studied Russian, worked for Mbonga in Kenya who is documented as a CIA asset.
file:///Z:/MN/Obama/Kenya%20-%20Tom%20Mboya%27s%20fatal%20links%20with%20CIA.ht m
Laura Rozen wrote in Mother Jones in September last year about "why some of Bush's intel pros are now working for a Democrat"
The team of former intelligence professionals who have come together to advise Barack Obama describe a candidate who they believe is open-minded and intellectually inclined to absorb information—not just the recognized current threats (terrorism, Iran, Iraq, Pakistan, a resurgent and more belligerent Russia), but the ones on the horizon (nuclear terrorism, water wars, climate change and the conflicts it could generate). But they also are urging him to rethink the architecture of the intelligence community to grapple with both current and emerging threats, and to do away with the Bush administration’s legacy of excessive secrecy and its tendency to view complex international challenges in black-and-white terms.Aside from Brennan, the campaign’s intelligence working group (which is coordinated by former National Security Council official Rand Beers) spans a range of national security professionals who have served in senior leadership, operational and legal positions in the National Security Council, CIA, and defense intelligence agencies, including many who served both Republican and Democratic administrations. Among them: Former CIA deputy director John McLaughlin, former senior CIA operations officers Art Brown and Jack DeVine, retired Ltn. Gen. Claudia Kennedy, retired Ltn. Gen. and former head of the Defense Human Intelligence Service Donald Kerrick, former CIA lawyer and special advisor to the CIA director Kenneth Levitt, former CIA general counsel Jeff Smith, former CIA Near East division chief Robert Richer, and former CIA officer Valerie Plame Wilson. Former CIA lawyer and Clinton-era NSC official Mary McCarthy has stepped back from her previous role coordinating the group due to private sector work demands.But some of Obama’s intelligence advisors say their experience with the recent administration has shown that leaders who think they already know it all can lead to disaster. “Old man Bush was a great guy,” says one veteran intelligence officer now supporting Obama, who requested anonymity. “He was truly interested and sensitive to intelligence. But this Bush administration has done terrible damage to the intelligence business. They have operated a perpetual campaign, treated intelligence as a political tool, and never fully appreciated why it must be non-partisan and objective and can’t be tampered with.”They seem happy so far and gave Obama a rousing welcome in Langley last month.“It’s time,” he continued, “for a very serious change.”
The Spies Who Love Obama – Laura Rozen at MotherJones.Com a texan in san francisco
What we are going to get from Obama, at least initially, is a more sophisticated, subtle mix than Bush. He is well positioned to keep Guantanamo open and keep the troops in Iraq and Afghanistan when neither McCain nor Clinton would have. At the end of the day he's there for the people with the big bucks, not for the people who wanted a more egalitarian society at home and a less harmful presence for the US abroad.



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote