Irish 'involved' in Bolivia 'assassination attempt'

[jcdf]

Bodies in a hotel, in their underware and no signs of a half hour seige as claimed by the Police. In short a half hour seige did not happen, and the deceased were not challanged outside the hotel and fled inside, as claimed by the government. Please explain how that verion of events makes any sense at all now? The evidance lies in the flat contradiction of the police version by the few witnesses.

Are you saying that the police version was true? If so please explain.

You are right Thac0man. I agree with you 100%. The Bolivian police are not to be trusted. They over reacted when they should have kept a cool head. Dwyer should not have been shot. They are too fearful to admit that they are wrong.

[Thac0man]

How do I know or how do you know. I wasnt there. Were you? You stated that the killing of these terrorist scumbags was "cold blooded murder" yet you have not shown any evidence that that is the case.

Theres a simple way to tell FG, does the police version add up? Does it make sense? Surely something so basic is within your capability? You seem to be 100% convinced about other so called evidance, yet you cannot offer an opinion (or dare not) on most transparent facts available?

[Mr Crowley]

Evidance of what? Its all hersay and circumstantial. All of it. Even the video evidance was about events after the fact - not a plot in the offing. If it were you would be on safe ground saying the things you are, but as it is all you are doing is slinging mud in the hope that it obscures the fact that actual evidance is in scant supply. As a matter a fact, actual evidance does not exist. Its all inferances.

The motley herd of apologists that have plagued this thread have to be representative of the most pathetic mental clusterf*ck that it has been my excuciating misfortune to read.

Confronted with evidence you spout shyte like the above. We had the assorted brainless 'friends' of Dwyer and the representatives of the Fascist brain trust like, yourself and FT.

Are you really a firm believer in the offensive filth that you align yourself with or is it an occupational affectation?

[FamilyGuy]

Theres a simple way to tell FG, does the police version add up? Does it make sense? Surely something so basic is within your capability? You seem to be 100% convinced about other so called evidance, yet you cannot offer an opinion (or dare not) on most transparent facts availble?

You still didnt answer what I asked you as well

why would you be concerned at cold blooded murder since you are a regular apologist for such cold blooded murder?

Whats different in this case that makes you so concerned?

And what exactly is your association with Flores?

Do you make a habit of regularly associating with Terrorist scumbags and suspected war criminals?

All fairly simple questions ThacOman. Why are you afraid to answer them?

[Thac0man]

You still didnt answer what I asked you as well

why would you be concerned at cold blooded murder since you are a regular apologist for such cold blooded murder?

Whats different in this case that makes you so concerned?

And what exactly is your association with Flores?

Do you make a habit of regularly associating with Terrorist scumbags and suspected war criminals?

All fairly simple questions ThacOman. Why are you afraid to answer them?

Bullsh*t. You are treading water here FG, as usual. This is incident 101 - does the version presented by the police equate with the facts, even those presented after the crime scene had been in police posession for hours?

As usual you seem to be hell bent on discussing anything except the facts, that which this thread is about discussing. Now will you please not answer a question with a question, but give a streight answer. Does the police version add up?

One more attempt to avoid answering that and I will have to assume you do not think the police version is correct. And we can proceed to discuss the ramafications of that. Now are you going to stand behind your convictions or are you not? You are either in the debate or your not and its not going to proceed until the facts and evidance are laid out and examined. In fact it cant proceed otherwise.

[Gruffalo]

You are right Thac0man. I agree with you 100%. The Bolivian police are not to be trusted. They over reacted when they should have kept a cool head. Dwyer should not have been shot. They are too fearful to admit that they are wrong.

Congrats Thac0man, you are getting support from the man that stated preemption and prevention are not part of the polices job.

[FamilyGuy]

I did answer you. I dont now the full detail and am not privy to the investigation, just liek you.

Now,you still havent shown any evidecne to back up your claim of cold blooded murder - nothing new there eh ThacOman?

And you still keep running away from the questions I askd you which are pertinent to this, especially your association with a known (now dead) right wing terrorist with links to fascist organisations and a suspected war criminal.

why would you be concerned at cold blooded murder since you are a regular apologist for such cold blooded murder?

Whats different in this case that makes you so concerned?

And what exactly is your association with Flores?

Do you make a habit of regularly associating with Terrorist scumbags and suspected war criminals?

All fairly simple questions ThacOman. Why are you afraid to answer them?


Is the world not a better place without scumbags like Flores ThacOman? Would you not think so?

[Thac0man]

I did answer you. I dont now the full detail and am not privy to the investigation, just liek you.

I asked for your opinion, you have actually offered none. You refused and still do.

Now I assume that if you did believe the police you would have absolutly no hesitation in saying so. Yet you won't. So you don't believe them. I think thats a fair assumption.

So what is the basis of you endorsement of subsequent inferances as facts, when there is as yet no concrete evidance that there was any wrong doing?

I know it was your hope that we could all charge ahead and ask no questions and swallow any and all bullsh*t without qustion, as evidanced by some frankly bizare conspiracy posts on this thread, but in reality its just not like that.

Now that we have established that you do not believe the police version of events, what evidance is there to back up the Bolivian govenments claims?

[FamilyGuy]

I asked for your opinion, you have actually offered none. You refused and still do.

Now I assume that if you did believe the police you would have absolutly no hesitation in saying so. Yet you won't. So you don't believe them. I think thats a fair assumption.

So what is the basis of you endorsement of subsequent inferances as facts, when there is as yet no concrete evidance that there was any wrong doing?

I know it was your hope that we could all charge ahead and ask no questions and swallow any and all bullsh*t without qustion, as evidanced by some frankly bizare conspiracy posts on this thread, but in reality its just not like that.

Now that we have established that you do not believe the police version of events, what evidance is there to back up the Bolivian govenments claims?

You are reverting to barefaced lied again ThacOman - a usual tactic for you so no surprise there.

And again you refuse to answer some very simple questions which relate to this case - your relationship with a suspected war criminal and right wing murderig terrorist scumbag with links to fascist organisations



I did answer you. I dont know the full detail and am not privy to the investigation, just liek you.

Now,you still havent shown any evidecne to back up your claim of cold blooded murder - nothing new there eh ThacOman?

And you still keep running away from the questions I askd you which are pertinent to this, especially your association with a known (now dead) right wing terrorist with links to fascist organisations and a suspected war criminal.

why would you be concerned at cold blooded murder since you are a regular apologist for such cold blooded murder?

Whats different in this case that makes you so concerned?

And what exactly is your association with Flores?

Do you make a habit of regularly associating with Terrorist scumbags and suspected war criminals?

All fairly simple questions ThacOman. Why are you afraid to answer them?


Is the world not a better place without scumbags like Flores ThacOman? Would you not think so?

[Thac0man]

You are reverting to barefaced lied again ThacOman - a usual tactic for you so no surprise there.

And again you refuse to answer some very simple questions which relate to this case - your relationship with a suspected war criminal and right wing murderig terrorist scumbag with links to fascist organisations



I did answer you. I dont know the full detail and am not privy to the investigation, just liek you.

Now,you still havent shown any evidecne to back up your claim of cold blooded murder - nothing new there eh ThacOman?

And you still keep running away from the questions I askd you which are pertinent to this, especially your association with a known (now dead) right wing terrorist with links to fascist organisations and a suspected war criminal.

why would you be concerned at cold blooded murder since you are a regular apologist for such cold blooded murder?

Whats different in this case that makes you so concerned?

And what exactly is your association with Flores?

Do you make a habit of regularly associating with Terrorist scumbags and suspected war criminals?

All fairly simple questions ThacOman. Why are you afraid to answer them?


Is the world not a better place without scumbags like Flores ThacOman? Would you not think so?

I refer you to my original post about knowing Flores. As usual you seem to have run away with yourself and lost the plot.

Now, back to the topic at hand, or are you still trying to avoid talking about the actual facts? Care to list off the evidance that you seem to invest so much faith in? Crowley has done a bunk, obviously unwilling (or smart enough, unlike you) to be seen to avoid answering the question about the police version of events.