Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Obama to escalate war in Afghanistan by sending extra 17,000 troops.

  1. #1
    Politics.ie Regular White Horse's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Dundalk
    Posts
    12,184

    Obama to escalate war in Afghanistan by sending extra 17,000 troops.

    Obama to sent extra 17,000 troops to Afghanistan - North America - Independent.ie

    US President Barack Obama has announced plans to send an extra 17,000 American soldiers to Afghanistan.
    The extra troops will join around 33,000 US soldiers who are already operating in the country.

    Obama continues to show his hand as a hawk dressed up as a dove.

    Plus ça change?

    <Mod> This thread has been merged with "Obama orders 17,000 troops to Afganistan". </Mod>
    Last edited by stringjack; 18th February 2009 at 08:51 PM. Reason: Merged thread.

  2. #2
    Politics.ie Regular Thac0man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Kildare/Dublin
    Posts
    10,430
    Twitter
    @

    Quote Originally Posted by White Horse View Post
    Obama continues to show his hand as a hawk dressed up as a dove.
    Obama made no secret of his desire to both withdraw from Iraq and bolster the deocratic government of Afghanistan when he was running for election. An extra 17,000 troops should go along way to containing the Taliaban insurgency.

  3. #3
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    3,012

    Quote Originally Posted by White Horse View Post
    Obama to sent extra 17,000 troops to Afghanistan - North America - Independent.ie

    US President Barack Obama has announced plans to send an extra 17,000 American soldiers to Afghanistan.
    The extra troops will join around 33,000 US soldiers who are already operating in the country.

    Obama continues to show his hand as a hawk dressed up as a dove.

    Plus ça change?
    This is a ridiculous post.
    Did you read his policies before the election?

  4. #4
    Politics.ie Regular sandar's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    London UK
    Posts
    7,103

    he said he was doing this in his election campaign, the consequences of losing in afghanistan are grave. and Obama has changed US policy in relation to afghanisatn anyway, he is trying to incvolve iran and pakistan in the solution, by inviting them to take a role (non military), thats bi partisanship which the Bush administration did not do.

  5. #5
    Politics.ie Member FutureTaoiseach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Dept. of FutureTaoiseach
    Posts
    39,825

    He is correct in this decision. America was attacked on 911 while the regime in Kabul admitted protecting Osama Bin Laden. They were given a month to hand him over, and refused, citing supposed obligations in Islam to show hospitality to "guests". The Taliban and Al Qaida asked for this. Much of the country is not under the control of the democratically-elected govt of President Hamid Karzai. Were the US to leave, the country would rapidly revert to control by the tyrannical Taliban regime and become an Osamastan. Unlike in Iraq, America's war in Afghanistan has right behind it. They are fighting to protect the West and the world from Islamofascist Al Qaida terrorism. Remember that this terror organisation massacred 3,000 men, women and children on 911. Irish people died in that terror attack, including a mother and her child on one of the planes. This is self-defence pure and simple.

  6. #6
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,634

    Obama orders 17,000 troops to Afganistan

    In his most significant military decision to date, President Obama has ordered an additional 17,000 US troops to Afghanistan. The move fulfills a campaign pledge to increase the size of the US occupation. The new deployments will take effect in May, increasing the US occupation force to 55,000—a 50 percent rise. Another 32,000 non-US NATO troops are also in Afghanistan. The news came as the UN said Afghan civilian casualties jumped by nearly 40 percent last year.

    Democracy Now! | Headlines for February 18, 2009


    Former United Nations human-rights investigator in Afghanistan and professor of law Cherif Bassiouni:

    "There is no military solution in Afghanistan. There is an economic-development solution, but I don't see that coming. Right now, the population has nothing to gain by supporting the United States and NATO. It has everything to gain by being supportive of the Taliban."

    Jimmy Carter has said on Obama's plan "I would disagree with Obama as far as a surge that would lead to a more intense bombing of Afghan villages and centers and a heavy dependence on military. I would like to see us reach out more, to be accommodating, and negotiate with all of the factions in Afghanistan."

    What do you think the real solutions are for Afganistan? The last person to triumph in Afganistan I believe was Gengis Khan. Are Obama's actions to further destabalise the situation?

    http://www.zcommunications.org/znet/viewArticle/20571/
    The love of equality in a democracy, limits ambition to the sole desire, to the sole happiness, of doing greater services to our country than the rest of our fellow citizens - Montesquieu

  7. #7
    He3
    He3 is offline
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    22,757
    "There isn’t a country of the 17 euro countries at present who could carry this in a referendum, there isn’t a single country bar Ireland." - Minister for Finance, on Bloomberg tv.

    What happens if ESM money poured into eurozone banks evaporates?

  8. #8
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,634

    Apologies, could the Mods merge the my post and delete thread. Thanks.
    The love of equality in a democracy, limits ambition to the sole desire, to the sole happiness, of doing greater services to our country than the rest of our fellow citizens - Montesquieu

  9. #9
    Politics.ie Regular PhoenixIreland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Dublin, Ireland
    Posts
    3,418

    I never understood why they couldn't just bomb the camps from the air and use special forces teams to extract terrorist targets.

    Why the nation building? Its utterly futile to nation build there from what I can see.

  10. #10
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    9,655

    im surprised other nato countries still havn't increased their troops numbers, this is the supposed 9/11 war,

    the polish said last week there are not sending an extra 1,600 troops, that the promised last year because of the economy.

    the uk sending are another lot of troops, but it just goes to show how small, eu countries armies are
    What does the Irish President spend their time doing. Work in progress
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Similar Threads

  1. Irish troops to stay in Kosovo and Afghanistan
    By Tommy Tayto in forum Current Affairs
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 19th August 2009, 01:54 AM
  2. Brits to send 4000 more troops to Afghanistan.
    By Mr Crowley in forum Foreign Affairs
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 5th April 2009, 08:17 PM
  3. When you hear US troops are killed in Afghanistan
    By Van Damme in forum Foreign Affairs
    Replies: 53
    Last Post: 7th September 2008, 08:01 PM
  4. US to send 12-15,000 troops to Afghanistan
    By politicsisrotten in forum Foreign Affairs
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 22nd August 2008, 05:05 PM
  5. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 28th April 2007, 08:00 PM