Page 1 of 8 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 79

Thread: The Coming War In Pakistan

  1. #1
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Gone
    Posts
    2,239

    The Coming War In Pakistan

    I have a feeling Pakistan is going to be forced to implode in the coming 2-3 years.

    The IMF just issued the government a loan, to cover the cost of imports. In return, the government is going to make a number of structural readjustments:
    *Lower wages to reduce inflation
    *Reduction in public spending
    *A new 7% tax on the production of wheat (There has been a chronic shortage of wheat over the past year, those who can afford to, stock up on massive amounts when they can. In some cases, people sometimes have to drive a half hour out of the capital in search of wheat)

    The situation is already volatile. Already there has been conflict between provinces over resources (food, electricity and so on). If the federal government doesn't have the cash to make transfers to the provinces, we could see the Balkanization of the country. A process which also involved the IMF/WB.

    A few months ago, 450,000 people fled the fighting in the north to camps.

    Then Mumbai happened.

    Now read below, talk about the perfect storm.

    I'd say half the people on the board are creaming themselves at the possibility of a major war in Pakistan.

    Alarm raised on threat of mass assault

    By Demetri Sevastopulo in Washington


    Published: December 4 2008 02:00 | Last updated: December 4 2008 02:00

    Terrorist organisations would succeed in using weapons of mass destruction within five years unless the world community "acts decisively", according to a congressionally mandated commission set up to scrutinise WMD after the September 11 attacks.

    "It is more likely than not that a weapon of mass destruction will be used in a terrorist attack somewhere in the world by the end of 2013," according to the report, released yesterday by the commission on the Prevention of WMD Proliferation and Terrorism.

    The report singled out Pakistan, a nuclear power, as the weakest link in global non-proliferation. Pakistan posed a "serious challenge" to US national security in the short and medium term, it said.

    "Were one to map terrorism and weapons of mass destruction today, all roads would intersect in Pakistan . . . Pakistan is an ally, but there is a grave danger it could also be an unwitting source of a terrorist attack on the US," said the report.

    The commission urged the Obama administration to create a strategy for Pakistan, including efforts to secure nuclear and biological weapons, while eliminating terrorist safe havens using "military, economic and diplomatic means".

    Full story here: FT.com / UK - Alarm raised on threat of mass assault

  2. #2
    Politics.ie Regular BodyofEvidence's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    4,283

    Quote Originally Posted by Asi-Irish View Post
    I have a feeling Pakistan is going to be forced to implode in the coming 2-3 years.

    The IMF just issued the government a loan, to cover the cost of imports. In return, the government is going to make a number of structural readjustments:
    *Lower wages to reduce inflation
    *Reduction in public spending
    *A new 7% tax on the production of wheat (There has been a chronic shortage of wheat over the past year, those who can afford to, stock up on massive amounts when they can. In some cases, people sometimes have to drive a half hour out of the capital in search of wheat)

    The situation is already volatile. Already there has been conflict between provinces over resources (food, electricity and so on).

    A few months ago, 450,000 people fled the fighting in the north to camps.

    Then Mumbai happened.

    Now read below, talk about the perfect storm.

    I'd say half the people on the board are creaming themselves at the possibility of a major war in Pakistan.

    Alarm raised on threat of mass assault

    By Demetri Sevastopulo in Washington

    Published: December 4 2008 02:00 | Last updated: December 4 2008 02:00

    Terrorist organisations would succeed in using weapons of mass destruction within five years unless the world community "acts decisively", according to a congressionally mandated commission set up to scrutinise WMD after the September 11 attacks.

    "It is more likely than not that a weapon of mass destruction will be used in a terrorist attack somewhere in the world by the end of 2013," according to the report, released yesterday by the commission on the Prevention of WMD Proliferation and Terrorism.

    The report singled out Pakistan, a nuclear power, as the weakest link in global non-proliferation. Pakistan posed a "serious challenge" to US national security in the short and medium term, it said.

    "Were one to map terrorism and weapons of mass destruction today, all roads would intersect in Pakistan . . . Pakistan is an ally, but there is a grave danger it could also be an unwitting source of a terrorist attack on the US," said the report.

    The commission urged the Obama administration to create a strategy for Pakistan, including efforts to secure nuclear and biological weapons, while eliminating terrorist safe havens using "military, economic and diplomatic means".

    Full story here: FT.com / UK - Alarm raised on threat of mass assault

    Its a massivly failed state. A classic example of sectarianisim not working. for all its faults, India is more or less not always a failed state. Pakistan's collapse will se the wildmen in the hills coming down with stax of dollars (ironic, no) to buy the nukes. Of course, they will have to deal with the US/Israeli/Indian/Russian special forces who will be tripping over themselves to take them out of te hands of the muj-loons. Thanks be that they havent got a delivery system that can reach israel... But they could sell them to Iran which has the range.

  3. #3
    Politics.ie Royalty toxic avenger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Oxfordshire
    Posts
    21,790

    The army will turn on the government if they sense an Islamist takeover. Pakistan is in for a rough ride within a few years.

  4. #4
    Politics.ie Newbie
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    45

    pakistan: thus far & no further

    I read this article

    Pakistan: Thus far and no further - Sify.com

  5. #5
    Politics.ie Regular southwestkerry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    some place cosy
    Posts
    2,362

    ... and their was silly old me thinking they would eye up taking over Afghanistan once the Brits and Yanks decided enough was enough. Maybe now the opposite well happen- as opposed to India getting any ideas.
    Advances in any field are built upon people with the small or personal view. Give Israel Your support, it needs it.

  6. #6
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Gone
    Posts
    2,239

    This part is particularly chilling:

    A divided Pakistan, a bleeding Pakistan, a Pakistan ever on the verge of collapse without actually collapsing --- that should be our objective till it stops using terrorism against India.

  7. #7
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Gone
    Posts
    2,239

    A bit of a hint at what RAW is already up to? Hastening the collapse of Pakistan?

  8. #8
    Politics.ie Regular Catalpa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Dublin West
    Posts
    27,450

    Quote Originally Posted by Asi-Irish View Post
    A bit of a hint at what RAW is already up to? Hastening the collapse of Pakistan?

    Does a Leopard change its spots?
    Europa Conventus Delenda Est

  9. #9
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Wicklow, Ireland
    Posts
    3,487

    step 1, secure / negate / destroy any nukes they have
    step 2, build a big fence and let them at it...
    step 3, who gives a feck
    Last edited by drbob1972; 4th December 2008 at 08:26 PM.

  10. #10
    Politics.ie Regular Clanrickard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Last outpost of freedom
    Posts
    17,537

    Quote Originally Posted by drbob1972 View Post
    step 1, secure / negate / destroy and nukes they have
    step 2, build a big fence and let them at it...
    step 3, who gives a feck
    It is a sectarian state which has allowed the Islamists too much power. The chickens are coming home to roost. All Islamic states should heed the lesson and put the kibbosh on any and all Islamist parties. Egypt could be heading the same way if they let the MB get more pwoer..
    "The Egyptians could run to Egypt, the Syrians into Syria. The only place we could run was into the sea, and before we did that we might as well fight.” -Golda Meir

Page 1 of 8 123 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 20
    Last Post: 19th March 2009, 12:35 PM
  2. Setting Up a War on Pakistan
    By Asi-Irish in forum Foreign Affairs
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 22nd February 2009, 12:51 PM
  3. What's Really Going on in Pakistan?
    By Asi-Irish in forum Foreign Affairs
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 19th November 2008, 01:38 PM
  4. Are we at war with Pakistan or not?
    By lostexpectation in forum Foreign Affairs
    Replies: 49
    Last Post: 18th September 2008, 11:07 AM
  5. Where to now for Pakistan?
    By St Disibod in forum Foreign Affairs
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 28th July 2007, 01:25 AM