
Originally Posted by
west'sawake
It takes an awful long time to go through all the material supplied and analysed by Almanac, Rhonda and others. I have to confess that I approached it from trying to pick holes in every detail, coming up with alternative explanations, only for my smug certainty to be shattered. Indeed I often imposed my own interpreation withou having gone though all the material. For example David Icke has no crediblity, and I can well see why he would be useful to those who do not want us to know the truth.
Also, I have had regular heated exchanges with people on other conspiracy theories such as Freemasonry, finding it ridiculous that they would assign so much power and influence to an organisaiton that simply cannot control all the variables in an unpredictable world, and being secret societies their activities are impossible to totally verify. This then is the nub of the whole issue, their secretiveness.
The only solution is to look at what has happened from 1914 onwards. Was it predicted to happen? Yes. Almana has shown taht. Was there a lot of speculaton of such an agenda (NWO) before now, Yes, for decades, Alman has shown that too. has a lot of 'progress' being made in implementing that NWO agenda, Yes, again he has shown this to be the case. has it apparently come to be nearly implemented because of a series of events that whether they be incidental, accidental, by design, or circumstantial evolution, the answer seems to be yes.
If all other possibilities no longer look reasonable and what we thought improbable or outrageous looks logical, then we are in trouble. Logic tells me Almanac, Rhonda, Lthse, et al are right. You have to go though it all and suspend the urge, be it based on wishful thinking to see flaws in minor details, having other possible alternative answers for specific parts becuase when you look at the whole, you might get the horrifying penny dropping reality that I have. I only bloody wish it wasn't so, those Bstds.