Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 23

Thread: US Supreme Court

  1. #1
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    624

    US Supreme Court

    Now that Rehnquist is reportedly dead, what type of Justice will Bush put forward?

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  2. #2
    Politics.ie Regular Pidge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    9,701

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  3. #3
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Galway
    Posts
    603

    More conservative then Roberts. The problem, however, is that the Dems will allow Roberts through [to make themselves look constructive and bipartisan] but will then hold up his new appointe with a filibuster.
    Not that it will change the makeup of the court, as he was a conservative. However, it will 'renew' this conservative seat for another 3 decades.
    Scalia for Chief Justice

  4. #4
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    14,534

    Re: US Supreme Court

    Quote Originally Posted by WyldeOne
    Now that Rehnquist is reportedly dead, what type of Justice will Bush put forward?
    Chief Justice, or just Justice? I read a report earlier that suggests he might consider putting Roberts forward as Chief Justice, and filling the remaining vacancy with someone else. I don't know how precedented something like that would be.

    I do think that he's in a pretty weakened state, politically, with falling approval ratings over Iraq, the disastrous handling of the hurricance aftermath and the possibility of serious problems arising in the next month from the investigation of the Valerie Palme leak. Because of this, I doubt if he'll try to nominate anything other than Roberts mark 2 (conservative, but nice enough not to scare the horses). Having said that, knowing my precognitive skills (not quite on a par with Danny's) he'll probably try to put Scalia forward.

    At the risk of being insensitive, though, this death doesn't really matter that much in terms of the make-up of the court. Renquist was a conservative, and will be replaced by a conservative, thus the balance will remain the same. It's the Day-O'Connor retirement that's much more significant.
    Failed liberal traitors:
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  5. #5
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    624

    I was under the impression that the Court itself chose which of them would be the Chief Justice based on legnth on the court. This would keep a "newbie" from really screwing things up.

    At the risk of being insensitive, though, this death doesn't really matter that much in terms of the make-up of the court. Renquist was a conservative, and will be replaced by a conservative, thus the balance will remain the same. It's the Day-O'Connor retirement that's much more significant.
    I agree with most of this. Bush isn't going to put forward another centrist, it should be a conservative, from his pov. I think part of the mystery surrounding the function of the court from the general pov of the public is what will truly make his death a massively significant event. There are a lot of arguments here about what the role of the Supreme Court is. Some think the role is to make laws, others to enforce laws. The role of the Court is to determine the Constitutionality of a law created by the legislative branch. Since most politicians are going to create their own spin on this, I think his death will be as interesting to watch as O'Connor's retirement.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  6. #6
    Politics.ie Regular mjcoughlan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Waterford
    Posts
    4,369

    I was sorry to hear of the death of William Rehnquist following a battle with thyroid cancer. Known in private to be a modest man in a very high-profile position, he had a very long and distinguished career serving the US Supreme Court for more than 33 years. The pro-life movement will certainly remember him for voting against the establishment of legalised abortions in 1973. I hope God remembers him now.
    MJ Coughlan,
    Waterford City.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  7. #7
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    14,534

    Quote Originally Posted by mjcoughlan
    I hope God remembers him now.




    What? Renquist - that's today? Sh.it, I completely forgot! Quick, someone make him a cup of tea and tell him I'll be down in five minutes.
    Failed liberal traitors:
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  8. #8
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    2,341

    Quote Originally Posted by mjcoughlan
    The pro-life movement will certainly remember him for voting against the establishment of legalised abortions in 1973.
    Yes, and the civil rights movement will remember him for trying to keep blacks out of shops and restaurants in 1964.

    I hope God remembers him now.
    Oh, I'm sure he will. :twisted:

  9. #9
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    1,485

    Dan Qualye needs a job, i think he should be in the running!
    The King of Men

  10. #10
    Politics.ie Regular Pidge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    9,701

    Quote Originally Posted by smiffy


    What? Renquist - that's today? Sh.it, I completely forgot! Quick, someone make him a cup of tea and tell him I'll be down in five minutes.
    LEGEND

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. DCU in Supreme Court Monday 29/6/9; end of tenure?
    By pangur1 in forum Education & Science
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 27th February 2011, 03:58 AM
  2. 2007 and the Supreme Court
    By jayblue in forum Progressive Democrats
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 22nd December 2006, 03:38 PM
  3. Mc Dowell for the Supreme Court?
    By drjimryan in forum Justice
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 7th October 2006, 08:49 PM
  4. Replies: 37
    Last Post: 2nd June 2006, 10:48 AM
  5. US Supreme Court Appointee
    By LordJagged in forum Current Affairs
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 21st July 2005, 12:18 AM