Actually the indications are from her own statements that Bhutto will persue a policy of fighting exrtemism in Pakistan, much in the same fashion as Musharraf has. Her eventual stop, before she was interrupted by the bombng, was to give a speech at the tomb of Jinnah, which I think was symbolically important, indicating her loyalty to the secular ideals laid down by Pakistans founder, and hence the preeminence of the State over other considerations.Originally Posted by seamasdefaoite
The legacy of Jinnah is a power one that Mussharraf is unable to lay full claim to while not holding fully elected office.
Under Bhutto we might expect to see harsher measures taken against government and ex-government officers who still sympathise with the extremists, relationships developed to a dangerous level under Nawaz Sharif. Musharraf has already purged the leadership of the ISI, but those leaders may still have their loyalists within the agency. Ex ISI leaders like General Hamid Gul make no secret of the allegance, he is even an official adviser to the Islamic council that controls the Taliban. These men can only be countered by a strong Pro-Pakistan nationalist agenda. It is the only force in my opinion that can counter the Islamisation introduced by another dictator (Zia) and brought to new heights by Nawaz Sharif.
I think the Bhutto/Musharraf alliance may lead to the inditment of certain individuals in Pakistan on grounds of treason, a devisive weapon yet to be deployed.
An intereting article on where Pakistans problems stem from here:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/...ld/2173818.stm



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote