Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: British Defeated in Iraq

  1. #1
    Politics.ie Regular Ponzi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    422

    British Defeated in Iraq

    The British are taking more casualties (even with a smaller force in Iraq) than last year. Soon they will be confined soley to Basra Airport. They will have to extradite themselves from this last small enclave at some stage. Might bring back memories of the American evacuation of the US embassy in Saigon Vietnam in 1975 (an unseamly shambles).


    "The British have basically been defeated in the south," a senior U.S. intelligence official said recently in Baghdad. They are abandoning their former headquarters at Basra Palace, where a recent official visitor from London described them as "surrounded like cowboys and Indians" by militia fighters. An airport base outside the city, where a regional U.S. Embassy office and Britain's remaining 5,500 troops are barricaded behind building-high sandbags, has been attacked with mortars or rockets nearly 600 times over the past four months.



    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...601401_pf.html

  2. #2
    Politics.ie Regular Aindriu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Somewhere up in the Wicklow mountains
    Posts
    14,300

    Re: British Defeated in Iraq

    Quote Originally Posted by Ponzi
    The British are taking more casualties (even with a smaller force in Iraq) than last year. Soon they will be confined soley to Basra Airport. They will have to extradite themselves from this last small enclave at some stage. Might bring back memories of the American evacuation of the US embassy in Saigon Vietnam in 1975 (an unseamly shambles).


    "The British have basically been defeated in the south," a senior U.S. intelligence official said recently in Baghdad. They are abandoning their former headquarters at Basra Palace, where a recent official visitor from London described them as "surrounded like cowboys and Indians" by militia fighters. An airport base outside the city, where a regional U.S. Embassy office and Britain's remaining 5,500 troops are barricaded behind building-high sandbags, has been attacked with mortars or rockets nearly 600 times over the past four months.



    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...601401_pf.html
    The septics aren't exactly winning either are they?
    One of the moderators on here really wrecks my head with his/her power mad ego
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  3. #3
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    5,557

    Given that the British once declared the ENTIRE CITY of Basra "A legitamite military target" and shelled it for days, this is a welcome development, and should make them think twice about invading someones country again.
    Just 1 gram of cocaine destroys 4m2 of tropical rainforest. Give it up ya selfish b'stards.

  4. #4
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    14,626

    http://www.icasualties.org/oif/

    3% of US casulaties are suicide.

  5. #5
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    9,658

    being defeated contends that you had a chance of winning? the US obviously are still deluded so the british not so
    What does the Irish President spend their time doing. Work in progress
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  6. #6
    Politics.ie Regular Ponzi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    422

    Re: British Defeated in Iraq

    Quote Originally Posted by Aindriu
    Quote Originally Posted by Ponzi
    The British are taking more casualties (even with a smaller force in Iraq) than last year. Soon they will be confined soley to Basra Airport. They will have to extradite themselves from this last small enclave at some stage. Might bring back memories of the American evacuation of the US embassy in Saigon Vietnam in 1975 (an unseamly shambles).


    "The British have basically been defeated in the south," a senior U.S. intelligence official said recently in Baghdad. They are abandoning their former headquarters at Basra Palace, where a recent official visitor from London described them as "surrounded like cowboys and Indians" by militia fighters. An airport base outside the city, where a regional U.S. Embassy office and Britain's remaining 5,500 troops are barricaded behind building-high sandbags, has been attacked with mortars or rockets nearly 600 times over the past four months.



    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...601401_pf.html
    The septics aren't exactly winning either are they?


    I'm under no illusion that the American position is just as bad if not worse. They are obliged to retain control of Iraqi Oil infrastructure no matter how bad the 'security situation' becomes over the coming years. However the British presence in the south is now utterly ineffectual, serving no purpose with regards to providing security let alone 'normalisation' or facilitating infrastructural development. Its a question of semantics as to how the British position is described. This American intelligence officer described it as defeat, the British would probably be describe it as a tactical concentration. Make up your own mind.

  7. #7
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    1,996

    In the south they had it easy in the initial years (and moaned like hell when they had to move into Sunni areas to cover while the yanks assaulted Fallujah).

    Now they are being left with an increasingly shtty end of the stick as the Yanks are changing sides in the internal conflict ... cutting deals with the Sunni (Baathist?) insurgents to have them take on the Islamicists and the Shia Militias whom the yanks view as Iran supported.

    The withdrawal of the Brits is inevitable as their position becomes increasinglu untenable. But what is the US plan to protect their supply lines from the south?
    Such a parcel of rogues in a nation!

  8. #8
    Kf
    Kf is offline
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    2,176

    SamLord makes a good point. The withdrawl of the Brits means that the main overland supply route will be even more vulnerable. The US would need to deploy 10,000 to the south to ensure it remains open, thats 10,000 that they simply don't have. This is the start of the final play in Iraq. Expect all foreign troops to be out by christmas 2008.

  9. #9
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    1,290

    Quote Originally Posted by Bogwarrior
    ...should make them think twice about invading someones country again.
    Don't hold your breath.
    "If the Germans land in Ireland they will be welcomed as liberators".

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 26th January 2011, 06:57 PM
  2. British Bring Biological Warfare to Iraq
    By Pericles in forum Foreign Affairs
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 12th July 2007, 11:48 PM
  3. British Forces in Iraq
    By Anne Marie in forum Current Affairs
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 19th June 2007, 04:13 PM
  4. British Prince Harry Going To Iraq
    By Munion in forum Foreign Affairs
    Replies: 66
    Last Post: 23rd February 2007, 02:06 AM
  5. British agenda in Iraq.
    By Bogwarrior in forum Foreign Affairs
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 20th September 2005, 12:58 PM