IAEA Says Iran Talks Fail on Denied Request - Bloomberg
Then it's war.
IAEA Says Iran Talks Fail on Denied Request - Bloomberg
Then it's war.
''A basic principle of modern state capitalism is that cost and risk are socialized to the extent possible, while profit is privatized.'' Noam Chomsky
Interesting quote, very influential chap back in the late 40s and early 50s.''It is not Russian military power which is threatening us, it is Russian political power"- George Kennan
A sincere diplomat is like dry water or wooden iron. - Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin
''A basic principle of modern state capitalism is that cost and risk are socialized to the extent possible, while profit is privatized.'' Noam Chomsky
Yeah, he was right actually. We went through him briefly in history recently, anyway.
I don't think Iran is a political threat either to be honest, they only became a threat when the US started leading the crusade against them, the fact that Iran hasn't broken is the only threat to the US currently.
A sincere diplomat is like dry water or wooden iron. - Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin
The NPT Iran signed does not give the inspectors permission to go on fishing expeditions. They only have authority to inspect declared nuclear sites. There is an additional protocol which would give the inspectors greater powers but Iran has not signed this, or to be precise, hasn't ratified it.
I would imagine Irans concern is if they open up all of their military sites to the IAEA inspectors, there is no doubt, the information re defences, construction etc will be in the hands of US and Israeli intelligence within minutes. This information would then be used to aid the forthcoming attack on Iran. It is important to bear in mind, the US do not claim Iran has a nuclear weapons program, and have stated so publicly. What they are saying, is that Iran might develop one in the future, and so they do not want them to have a knowledge of nuclear science. Once again a compliant media are portraying Iran's actions as if it were a breach of the NPT: it is not, and no country in the world, especially the US and Israel would allow that sort of unfettered access to their military bases.
With demands such as that an attack seems inevitable, and so Iran would be pretty foolish to show them where their conventional weapons - missiles etc are manufactured and stored.
No, though there was talk of allowing the Russians limited access.
Tentative Inspection Program Would Allow Russia to Visit U.S. Nuclear Sites
Published October 13, 2009 | FOXNews.com
Russia and the United States have tentatively agreed to a weapons inspection program that would allow Russians to visit nuclear sites in America to count missiles and warheads.
The plan, which Fox News has learned was agreed to in principle during negotiations, would constitute the most intrusive weapons inspection program the U.S. has ever accepted.
Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, who met with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, said publicly Tuesday that the two nations have made "considerable" progress toward reaching agreement on a new strategic arms treaty.
Read more: Tentative Inspection Program Would Allow Russia To Visit U.S. Nuclear Sites | Fox News
Iran has not said, or intimated, that it will walk away from the NPT agreement. However, they do have a right to do so if they so wish. But while on the subject of breaking treaties, it is of interest that, that paragon of virtue, the US, has had no problem in unilaterally walking away from treaties it has signed, such as the 1972 – Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty aka ABM Treaty which the US unilaterally withdrew from in 2002. So what do you think their punishment should be? Sanctions? A few cruise missile strikes?
And a massive sense of relief as Mr Aphorisms recovers from a near heart attack reading such a biased and lazy, drivel infested post.. Take notes kids. Word of the day: Propaganda, with a capital P.
Two things from this:Israel has not signed the NNPT nor have they said they will wipe anyone out.
1: Israel doesn't want to sign the NNPT, but wants everyone else to sign it. Where is the logic in that?
2: The implication by what you said about wiping anyone out is the pseudo-quote attributed to Ahmadinejad that promotes his intention to wipe Israel off the map by force.
Ahmadinejad didn't actually say it, he was quoting the Ayatollah.
The Ayatollah said that Israel must disappear from the face of the map, just as the Soviet Union did.
Quotes from Ahmadinejad have been similar. Israel must disappear from the "geographical", etc, etc, etc. But no where, not once did himself or Iran threaten to wipe Israel off the map, at all. No talking of killing Jews either. Why promote your mad lies?
You really have your head under the sand, have't you? Israel is blowing up Nuclear scientists in Iran and funding Islamic fundamentalists in Iran to disrupt the Iranian system. Yet, there has been no retaliation. A U.S predator drone was shot down in Iran, no retaliation. Sanctions are being put on Iran, no act of war retaliation.They have threatened Israel which rightly will not take the threats lying down. Iran's own fault.
Not to mention former Mossad and current heads saying war Iran would be to the detriment of Israel and most of their populace being against it.
If anyone is looking for a war though, it is Israeli government.
It is funny how you people love to talk about international law and how Iran defies it. Yet when Reagan was condemned by the World Court and ordered to pay reparations to Nicaragua, the Americans laugh and you people don't scream at all. Why is that? Why are Muslim countries held to these laws so vigorously but the U.S, Israel and Britain are not?If they have nothing to hide why are they hiding?
"When they do it, it's terrorism. When we do it, it's counter terrorism." Noam Chomsky
"You're in the Oval Office and Raul Castro calls. What would be your response, Congressman Paul?" "Well, I'd probably ask him what he wants."
The debate over what exactly Ahmadinejad said at that World Without Zionism Conference in 2006 and the translation of it has been long trashed out however the slogan from this years revolution celebrations seem to be a close paraphrasing of the infamous comments -
from Ahmadinejad's 2006 speech -
- this has been variously translated as "Israel must be wiped off the face of the Earth"or "the Zionist entity should be removed from the pages of history" - a pretty semantic argument, I think the meaning is obvious - but in anycase compare this with the slogan on the banner (complete with helpful english translation) -"بايد از صفحه روزگار محو شود"
"Israel must be wiped out of the scene" The Persian is not an exact quote of Ahmadinejads words - there is an extra word to the right of the line - but it seems to be remarkably close. Was it intended as a deliberate paraphrase? Or perhaps it was Khomeini's original phrase - which Ahmadinejad didn't just "quote", he reiterated it and reinvoked it as a national objective.
Last edited by Nebuchadnezzar; 23rd February 2012 at 11:50 PM.