"..
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
and discombobulated secularism, unable to assert itself positively...asserts itself ..repressively."
A demagogue is someone who will preach doctrines he knows to be untrue to men he knows to be idiots.
"..
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
and discombobulated secularism, unable to assert itself positively...asserts itself ..repressively."
I doubt it. Since when have the CCP bowed to foreign business interests? google isn't the only game in town - as an earlier poster said, it's nto even the No 1 search engine in China. I don't reckon this will bother the Chinese authorities very much at all.If they actually stand up to the CCP thugs on this one, it may make quite a difference.
No matter what you think of yourself, the moment you try to justify the murder of an innocent with idealism, no matter what that ideal might be, you take your place on the side of evil and all your claims to virtue are as naught.
Nor should it. Just thinking in the very long term, I don't want global multinationals dictating new law to governments. Google is one of the most powerful companies in the world. For me the hack attempt is a smokescreen to Google's true wish, to do business in China as they see fit.
If they succeed in China, would we be cheering them on if they took the same tack with Germany? "If you don't let our searchs bring up nazi memorabilia, we'll leave"
I personally think this is not going to happen, Google won't walk away from 1/6th of the world's population, but if they want to, let them walk.
I remember when many companies and countries refused to stay in SA in the 80s over apartheid, which I totally agreed with. But they just pulled out. They didn't move in to SA in 1982, then start complaining in 1985 "Wow you guys are kind of racist. We'd like you to change, just enough that it benefits our business model please"
I think that's the Chinese attitude - not just to this, but to so many other things. Take it or leave it, basically. I also agree that Google will end up taking it - though maybe with some kind of face saving cover story.Google won't walk away from 1/6th of the world's population, but if they want to, let them walk.
Yeah, and of course RSA was a fairly insignificant market in international terms, and the regime had little clout on the world stage. It simply wasn't worth the opprobrium for most companies to stay there, given the fairly small profits on offer. The same is absolutely not true for China - and the Chinese know it.I remember when many companies and countries refused to stay in SA in the 80s over apartheid, which I totally agreed with.
Oh totally. My point was really about the disingenuous nature of the Google argument to suddenly start acting amazed that there's censorship in China. "Well when we moved in we knew they were led by an unelected government who routinely spy on it's population, and we agreed to censor our product. But then they tried to spy on OUR customers!! Why I was so shocked my monacle fell out."
BTW, would Google be threatening to pull out of the US if Homeland Security tried to hack a suspected terrorist's account? No.
"..
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
and discombobulated secularism, unable to assert itself positively...asserts itself ..repressively."