That is as one-sided a cardboard cut-out as Cael's. A million Iraqi's are estimated to have died in the last ten years to satisfy our addiction to cheap oil. There has been one US backed dictatorship after another in Latin America. The US now officially endorses torture.
A billion people in capitalist countries are on the verge of starvation.
This should be in the history section.
I dont know why you are saying that I have given a cardboard cut out description. I have criticised the Communist regimes and talked about the corruption in them. What Im saying is that they achieved huge social benefits for working class people. Thats the point that RTE and the right wing posters here are trying to deny. What one realises when watching George Lee's program is that benefits for the working class, such as secure jobs and housing, free health care and child care, and cheap entry to the theatre and ballet, are of no interest to Lee. He considers them non-factors, as do his right wing cheerleaders. Why is that? Of course, its because Lee does not regard working class people as real people. Only the professional classes and the landowners and bankers are real people. And, it is mostly these people who had a problem with Communism. So, in Lee's eyes, communism was or is against people, full stop.
And I've previously thanked you for similar posts on this and other threads.
Lenin said on numerous occasions that he didn't expect Russia to survive as a workers' state without a revolution in Germany or other major developed countries. It is testimony to enormous efforts and sacrifices by workers internationally that the USSR and other workers states survived as long as they did. The US, in order to eventually break them down, invested a vast amount of resources, with its own people on a stagnant income level for the last 30 years and now faced with a national debt of many trillions and a declining currency.
The problems imo were made worse, and many opportunities lost, by political errors of Stalinism, that adopted a fixed view of social development (stages theory) and promoted the idea of "socialism in one country". The Stalinist bureaucracy had a vested interest in resisting change, as its own status was based largely on economic underdevelopment and peoples' feeling that a "strong leadership" was needed to defend the USSR from the West.
Correct, In 1938!
Followed by Joe Stalin in 1939 (he "won" again in 1942)
Time Person of the Year - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good comment today from Myers on Irish communist cheerleaders & their general lack of shame.
Kevin Myers: Stalinists thought they had got away with the Big Lie - Kevin Myers, Columnists - Independent.ieA young Irish student there named O hEithir -- the son of the RTE broadcaster Brendan -- introduced me to some of his Czech friends. They knew nothing about Ireland, save the Workers Party, which they detested. "What are these people, the Irish Workers Party?" asked one, with the others listening in, and nodding in agreement. "Why do they come here, telling us we live in a socialist paradise? We live in poverty and humiliation, and they come here for a week, are shown the most touristic parts of imperial Prague by communist party hacks, they tell us how lucky we are, and then they go home. Bastards."
Twenty years ago, when tyranny and armies of secret police oppressed the peoples of eastern Europe, where stood the Irish left? And does it make them feel proud today, that in the one great example of right and wrong in European politics in their entire lifetimes, they stood shoulder-to-shoulder with the apparatchiks of the Soviet Union?
So, what precisely is the enlightened, socialist, principle which causes a "democrat" to defend foreign, autocratic regimes from demands from democrats for democracy within their own countries?