I dont think that there is need for much explaination here...
as i see it, there are four issues.
1. The road tax
2. The train ticket
3. The case with the builder
4. The small matter of planning...
There is one thing that bothers me... The judge was satisfied last week that Eames was not involved with the building (structure) of the house.... that is why the case against her - specifically her- was dropped. Yet in the article appears to indicate that she was heavily involved with design, planning and perhaps even engineering.... Is there a question mark there perhaps - or am i over analysing it..?
?I?ve been left reeling by tsunami of events? says Healy Eames after car tax revelation




119Likes

