Bertie has us all convinced that he's going to let this government run to the end of its term - just like the last time - and everyone's gearing up for an election in 2007. But is that really the case? He's asking his back benchers to raise their profile and get out around their constituencies this summer. Does he plan to call a snap election much earlier?
Reasons why he would call a snap election:
FG/Lab gaining momentum and credibility.
The intent to put a voting pact together has clearly been agreed, but on the ground nothing has been done to formalise it. Some vote winning proposals on Child care, taxation, and Anti-social behaviour have been put together, but they're not being communicated widely to the electorate. It may well be in FF's interest to cut and run to the country earlier before FG/Lab get their act together and start making some serious inroads with voters.
New candidates not in place
This particularly affects FG. FF have most of their candidates in place (sitting TD's) and as a consequence can cope with a snap election quite easily. FG, on the other hand, haven't got prospective candidates in place, yet alone selected, in most of the constituencies where they would hope to make relatively easy gains. Yes alot of good potential candidates came through in the local elections, and there have been a couple of high profile wins, but none of them is out on the ground trying to raise their profile now. FF might feel under pressure, but maybe it's easier to take on an organisation that is nowhere near ready than risk waiting.
Flagship Infrastructure Projects
Quite a few flagship projects, particularly roads, are due to be completed early next year, and it's pretty evident that the contractors are all puling the stops out to finish ahead of schedule. Why? Because FF want them to, so that they can generate good PR for themselves, and try and create a feel good factor. They might be taking a few hits now, but if people feel better about their commute etc, they forget the bad stuff, fast which leads me on to.....
The Budget
Here we go again - The coffers are bulging (never mind that they're p***ing money away extravagantly with f*** all return for joe public) again, and don't we all know it. Expect a giveaway budget this Christmas, with nice increases in take home pay hitting the back account in January 2006. Maybe they'll row back a bit on individualisation or give tax credits for child care to show what caring people they are. either way they'll let the electorate feel a bit better off, which leads me on to........
SSIA's
Mc Creevy's masterstroke introduced in 2001. The first bountiful cheques start rolling into bank accounts in May 2006 - Are we looking at a summer election. Expect a boost in consumer spending, and more people feeling good again. again why would FF wait until mid 2007?
Reasons why he wouldn't call a snap election
Too arrogant to bother
They don't believe the opposition have a chance of chucking them out so why bother going to the country early!
Receiving too many hits - Needs to fix them
They're in trouble on Health - no quick fixes here, and they may want to ride it out as long as possible in the hope that they can patch things up. Mind you at the rate problems are being highlighted the problem is probably too big for them to fix.
Law and Order - They're floundering over criminal behaviour (operation anvil), anti-social behaviour (ASBO's to please well heeled voters), and in the dock over the findings of the Morris tribunal. they need to move Mc Dowell's focus away from Cafe Bars to Squad Cars and that's going to take them quite a bit of time.
Education - More chaos - A raft of promised school builds deferred yet again by Mary Hanafin, leading to yet more overcrowded classrooms and sub-standard accommodation. Again they need time to get their act together.
There are lots of other fires they want to put out such as school bussing, Aer-lingus, etc.
Conclusion?
Even if there isn't an early election, wouldn't it make sense for FG:
To work on it's programme now, and start convincing people early so that they're more likely to swing our direction at an election; and
Put candidates in place early in the seats and constituency where they need to make gains.
Well what do you think?



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote