I am massively disappointed by this, I would suggest that George Lee is massively naive to leave like this as he should have known that politics is a long term project. Yet I can understand the feeling of frustration of not having any proper input into what policies the party even considers, not to mind adopts. People forget that unlike football teams we choose to be members of a political party because of a combination of underlying principles, policies and the personnel to carry them through. I think the Labour party is full of decent, sensible, honourable people but I'm not a member because I don't believe in their approach and worldview. But I'm not married to FG and I'm not going to be a member if the party decides to adopt policies I can't identify with. That is not the at present.
I had suggested prior to this that FG should have changed the front bench to allow Leo, George and Richard tag team on Mary Coughlan and Lenihan. But we should have spent the last 2 years investigating what it is that underpins our policies. Instead we had an announcement about 4 policy areas and then nothing, until last year with the report from Alan Dukes on health policy which is quite good but had no involvement of the members at any stage. So what is the point of being a member? But the other 3 areas...nada.
What this shows up is the lack of political involvement. I've felt it for years but I'm realistic enough to know that it's by chipping away at things that openings and change will happen not big bangs
I think the party has to have a cold hard look at itself, this is part of the reason that it is so hard for younger people to get involved in party politics in Ireland where there is no formal structures for policy based politics.
I'm sure that the initial focus in commentary will be that this raises questions for Enda Kenny as leader, I don't think this really a matter of how Enda has lead the party or his own qualities as leader but moreover for me it raises questions of how Irish politics, is organised generally and more specifically how FG chooses how it does its business.
Just to give one example, over the weekend I was making some last notes to a doc I received about input into the structure of the upcoming national conference that is to take place on March 19/20th. these has to be received by close of business tomorrow Feb 9th. Now given the planning that goes into a conference does anyone really think that these contributions will all be read and processed in time to allow any changes of substance to the conference format? No neither do I. I had tried prior to the Wexford conference to make suggests, but again they got lost in the system and I heard nothing back. I made, along with another person, a presentation to the national exec about new methods of campaigning in 2005 but it again elicited no decision on any action before it was raised with us again a few years later, but that foundered again for odd reasons of process. Frankly speaking, political parties make the public service like speedy and nimble.
FG isn't unique, in Irish politics, in having these problems but it is to FG's own benefit that it would address those problems. That must start right now.



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote