Having been out of the country since last Thursday (and thank you to those who showed such concern as to my whereabouts), there I was enjoying a nice getaway, until my phone started to combust around lunchtime yesterday. So anyway, rather than read through 1,300 posts, this is my opinion:..............
So there's no good way of looking at that side of it. Having said that, the whole affair tells us something about Lee - namely that, with an attitude like that to the people around him, he'd be a disaster either on the front bench or in Cabinet. And that would even apply to a majority government - because like all teams, cabinets and front benches have to take decisions, with varying levels of agreement or enthusiasm amongst its members. If Lee is gonna flounce out every time his view isn't automatically accepted as the only one, then he won't go far in any team-orientated environment. So while Lee would have been a great asset in getting us to government, he could have been a right pain when we got there. ....................
Finally, I noticed on an early page of this thread (before I'd decided that life's too short to read 1,300 posts) that some posters were claiming that this whole thing shows that
FG are just a time-servers party - that you put in your years, you don't rock the boat, and eventually, "when its your turn", you get onto the front bench. And that thus,
FG were unable to handle someone with talent who wasn't gonna hang around.[B] And quite frankly, thats boll0cks. If it was true, then the front bench would include PJ Sheehan, Paul Connaughton, Padraig McCormack and John Perry, while there'd be no Leo Varadkar, Olwyn Enright, Brian Hayes or Simon Coveney on it. There's also a notion that somehow businesses are so much better at promoting people than political parties, but its a false notion. Businesses are in a position to headhunt people who are already a proven success in the field that business operates in, and obviously they then put them where their talents are best deployed. But NO-ONE gets promoted to the board on their first day on the basis of their exam results, or what they said in the interview. And Lee, while proven in one area, was new to another one, and thus needed to time to [/B
]find his feet. That was shown with his suicidal PQ that he almost asked, about the potential savings in chopping 10 weeks off maternity leave. It doesn't matter how good you are, or how much conviction you have, if you do things that are just plain stupid, you won't get anywhere. And that was. That kind of thing, if produced by a potential minister during an election campaign, would be a seat-loser with bells on - and without the seats to be in power, you can't use your talents in the service of the people.
So taking a bit of time to learn the basics of your new job, before insisting you should decide company strategy, isn't always such a bad thing..............
.