Yes
No
No offence to the OP, I can see why it was posted, but this poll is a little pointless on 2 counts:
It's biased as it implies the budget will not be severe enough, and that the budget must be severe (obviously, it needs to be, but is that severe for our times or severe in the context of the past two decades? This is ambiguous).
Also it makes a prediction about a budget we have not seen ... so wouldn't it be a better idea to do this after the budget is released?
Ie, Is the budget severe enough?
Agree with NM 123 - How can you poll on this question?
Severe against who ?
McDaid when commenting following his "Tá" on the budget will state " The Minister got the balance right"
Mammy, get the hammer there's a fly on daddy's head.
Severe on who?The ordinary middle class Joe Blogg,who is trying to keep the wolf from the door,while the rest of these Politicos insulate themselves against it.
A champion of the people emerges with the age-old and appealing promise of "something for nothing" - to be financed through every-increasing taxes. Supply and demand are thrown out of gear - the overhead goes up; the effective use of human energy goes down; the standard of living is lowered because money cannot buy wealth that is not produced.
WEAVER, HENRY GRADY,
they are now trying to ut do each other to take cuts and seem like saving the countries finances. gas.
Thank you Deputy McDaid.
We need 6 billion or we are bankrupt.
What the Labour party is doing is treasonable.
Liquidate labour, liquidate stocks, liquidate the farmers, liquidate real estate.