
Originally Posted by
eurosceptic
Excellent piece in the sunday tribune by diarmad doyle. He reflects on this in the light of the post referendum viciousness by the yes side. The recent attempt to smear DG over the alaskan deal (which was fully within the rules) is one example. Have to say in my own experience of the campaign the yes people became increasingly aggressive and nasty as the yes lead slipped away. In the early stages the debates were gentlemanly and i enjoyed a few pints afterwards but as it became clear it going to be a close one everything changed. I have to agree any new referendum which will be the constitutional project in some guise (perhaps the treaty of paris) will be very unpleasant indeed. Do you agree?
"referendum viciousness by the yes side"? Are you taking the piss?
The No side
- lied about conscription (and don't give me the rubbish that you did not. I was told a pack of lies on the issue by Coir, by RSF, by
SF and others in canvassing on my doorstep, in leaflet drops, and in canvasses in two different shopping centres. Coir in particular were the biggest set of liars I have ever come across in thirty years of referendum campaigns.)
- lied about 118C, deliberately misquoting it.
- lied about the commissioners
- lied about a mythical quote from Gisgard d'Estaing.
- lied about abortion
- lied about taxation
- lied about the mythical 'President of Europe'
- lied about whether we could have more referenda
and told tons of other lies. I have never come across a campaign where one side (the No side) told so many barefaced lies.
The failure of the Yes side was that it didn't nail the lies (and all were demonstrably false and dishonest). They led too many lies go unchallenged.
Next time the Yes side will not be as gentlemanly and will point out the No side for what they are: a pack of liars.