Originally Posted by former wesleyan

Soros. Easier to spell than Rothschilds.

And "people" apparently.

ETA: Dammit Carlos, got there before me.

Originally Posted by eoghanacht

George is a nice human being, if you can put aside his collusion with Nazi's.

I thought the Israelis banned him ?

Originally Posted by former wesleyan

Soros. Easier to spell than Rothschilds.

If there were more than one should it be Rothschildren?

Originally Posted by eoghanacht

George is a nice human being, if you can put aside his collusion with Nazi's.

When he was nine. Nice try though. Bigot.

Originally Posted by eoghanacht

George is a nice human being, if you can put aside his collusion with Nazi's.

That nonsense has been debunked before on this forum. Why would you put forward such a horrible slander?

Originally Posted by Wagmore

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-i...-idUSKBN19V1J4

Time for a proper discussion on this individual. He's described as a global philanthropist but safe to say his largesse is confined to pseudo-Liberal causes that include mass immigration and multiculturism. His funding fingerprints are all over organisations dedicated to progressing the secular agenda. His defenders have heretofore described any criticism of Soros as having its origins in anti-Semitism. That's why this Israeli criticism of Soros marks a new departure. Let's hear what posters have on this creep.
PS-apologies about typo in title

Philanthropist chooses to give his money to worthy causes of his choice , the height of evil ok .

Originally Posted by Dame_Enda

I'm tired of the number of organisations getting funding from his OSF. Let him stand for election if he thinks we support his agenda.

Im adamantly opposed to his open borders agenda. Don't forget the Irish job losses caused by the collapse of Sterling in 1992, which in part was a result of his role in the UK having to leave the ERM.

It's his money , who he gives it to is up to him. He does'nt have to stand for election in order to do this .

How he made that money in 1992 is more honest than Trump having people do work for him and then stiff them when it came to getting paid

Originally Posted by Dame_Enda

I'm tired of the number of organisations getting funding from his OSF. Let him stand for election if he thinks we support his agenda.

Im adamantly opposed to his open borders agenda. Don't forget the Irish job losses caused by the collapse of Sterling in 1992, which in part was a result of his role in the UK having to leave the ERM.

Where do I apply for the money?

Good article about Soros in the NY Times today:
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/17/o...l-right-region

It addresses the issue raised in the OP.

Originally Posted by Wagmore

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-i...-idUSKBN19V1J4

Time for a proper discussion on this individual. He's described as a global philanthropist but safe to say his largesse is confined to pseudo-Liberal causes that include mass immigration and multiculturism. His funding fingerprints are all over organisations dedicated to progressing the secular agenda. His defenders have heretofore described any criticism of Soros as having its origins in anti-Semitism. That's why this Israeli criticism of Soros marks a new departure. Let's hear what posters have on this creep.
PS-apologies about typo in title

No doubt if you had six billion quid you would pore it into the causes of hatred and division.