They have thousands of foreign troops from UsUk stationed within their borders in peacetime, many people would call that the very definition of an occupation. It used to be that it was said this was cold-war support or earlier than that to maintain order in the chaos of post WW2 - but those excuses no longer wash, Germany is nominally regarded as sovereign and democratic and the Iron Curtain has fallen. Germany pays for these troops itself so the argument (sometimes mooted) that their presence stimulates the economy in Germany is a null point, another explanation is that Germany and the US and UK are just so.... friendly that Germany doesn't mind having these troops here, but in the real world Germany and USUK have different policies in many areas and their economies are in competition, no two countries are that 'close' that one of them in peacetime would permit another to maintain a substantial military presence on it's soil. It may be that the German Govt is unhappy with these troops but will not ask for them to be removed as this might prompt a refusal and the status quo allows Germany AND Usuk to pretend they are there with the Germans' blessings, which avoids an international crisis.
Let's not forget Japan and the extremely unpopular US military presence in that country (which they also have to pay for), could be a case in parallel.
I think the Germans are occupied, as are the US and the UK and that's the truth of it. It's a few hundred famillies that control events, a definite very tiny minority of voices anyway. You can tell when in roulette the wheel is spun and the ball always settles on black that something is wrong with the wheel or the ball. When Obama and Bush favor certain famillies like the Goldmans with trillion dollar bailouts when money is scarce, when they launch massive wars based upon lies far away and cannot afford them then you know this is the kind of action that also favors a tiny few people, a core of insiders. When in the UK all three parties promote wars that they cannot afford. When Germany gives free warships to Israel, when the whole 'West' pretends nothing unusual is happening when that country continues to violate all principles of humane behaviour. When massive paranoia is disseminated because of a few attacks that in themselves remain controversial (as to whether the stated enemy was really behind them or if it was internal workings), to the point where in the UK today they are talking of bringing their army onto the streets. It's clear that there are anti-democratic forces within these nations (and likely our own too) who have cornered the 'market' on democracy and effectively run the show through control of the parties themselves and they work for people with a definite and narrow agenda of their own.
We must never get duped into joining NATO and maintain our neutrality at all costs, taking a different position is always a negative. I pity England that has to spend so much on these wars that do not benefit the people because it's forces aren't locked into a neutral position, the US is in the worst state and has to spend more on it's military than the rest of the world combined to feed the desires of this international elite, i guess in that way Germany are fortunate (although they must pay in other ways i guess just as we do) but at least not in blood (well until they involved themselves in Afghanistan) as well, i guess sometimes it is the case that winning a World War has it's drawbacks too, just as losing one does.



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote