LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksl don't condemn personal life issues if they do not effect office Tradcat. l'd have been surprised if Bush had a mistress or boyfriend though. Thats not what papa grabbi has done. he's a sexist geriatric with behavioural issues.
l don't condemn personal life issues if they do not effect office Tradcat. l'd have been surprised if Bush had a mistress or boyfriend though. Thats not what papa grabbi has done. he's a sexist geriatric with behavioural issues.
The voters who have kept him in power must have had issues too. He is not exactly discrete.
I would always profoundly distrust politicians who are of this Ghengis Khan womanising mode. They are always me feiners who should not be let near government. Berlusconi, you could say, is expressing his politics in that he commodifies women. You would find some politicians on the left who, far more hypocritically, are of the same mode. None of them are worth a damn. Its a good way of dividing the goats from the rest.
quite a double standard to negate women and then politicise on their issues, the crime of both the theocrat and the libertine. as to Conservatives : John Magor
His trial starts on Monday.
lurvely, then to the divorce courts.
the man who adjusted a Tiepolo boob (cos nipples can be offensive, apparently) is accused of tailoring law to cope with his er burgeoning hubris : http://intl.m1.yahoo.com/p/search/ne...%3Bqby%3Dopera
Originally Posted by He3
He has another trial starting on Friday week....
If you took care to read my post, which obviously as a feminist you are incapable of doing, you would see that I do not catogorically deny some forced person-trafficking taking place.
I say that the entire feminist narrative in relation to with "sex trafficking" is wrong. I say that it is baseless propaganda, with nothing to back it up, and once the facts are properly investigated (as the UK police as done) the deceitful nature of the feminist "sex trafficking" campaign becomes abundantly apparent.
"Sex trafficking" - thanks to feminist management of the term - has immediate connotations of "an endemic" and "violence [by the Patriarchy or men] against women". Mass numbers of women working as "sex slaves" where there is no free will involved. These ideas have become fundamental to the public understanding of the term "sex trafficking", and they are myths.
The supposedly "right-wing" press has done a great job co-opting this narrative.
Are there isolated cases of forced sex trafficking? Yes there are. Does this trafficking occur at anywhere near the levels that feminist propagandists say they do, and for the reasons they describe? Of course not.
Why not drop the doctrinaire cheap propaganda lines for a moment "dot", and peruse the UK police report on trafficking in prostitution.
Why do you deny the facts contained therein?
Last edited by Electro; 13th November 2009 at 05:13 PM.
Marxists, Feminists and Leftists operate on the basis of "liberating tolerance" - i.e. their ideas should be tolerated, and any opposition should be suppressed.
Ha! very interesting post. But how do you integrate your sig and your beliefs about feminism to the history of how it was used by the CIA as a counter to class politics ?
Reply With Quote