LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksYour best attempt at to discredit? Pah! Obvious.Originally Posted by evercloserunion
Your best attempt at to discredit? Pah! Obvious.
Green billionaires take a hit as markets nosedive
.Global warming con men hoping to bag windfall profits from the climate change scam are wincing today after carbon trading markets nose dived following the failure at Copenhagen to secure legally binding targets on restricting CO2 emissions.
Barclays Capital director Trevor Sikorski labeled the Copenhagen result “very disappointing” and said that the outlook for the global carbon market was bearish
Carbon Trading Scam In Big Trouble After Copenhagen Failure
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X5LdkSqmgyw"]YouTube- Alex Jones Tv {Sunday Edition} Copenhagen:A New Framework for Global Domination Via EU Police![/ame]
Apparently the EU are to be the vanguard in the area of policing nations and their compliance to carbon emissions - Gordon Brown has spoken
"The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.'' ~ J. Edgar Hoover
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
For the second winter in a row, Bay Area residents who burn wood, fire logs and pellets on high-pollution days run the risk of earning citations and fines from local air regulators.
Fines for burning on winter Spare the Air days - SFGate
this is getting out of hand
"The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.'' ~ J. Edgar Hoover
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Copenhagen climate change summit: The world is COOLING not warming says scientist Peter Taylor ... and we're not prepared | Mail OnlineLike a magician who fools themselves but not audience, the Anthropomorphic Global Warming (AGW) lobby have identified the wrong problem and the wrong solution.
Global cooling threatens disaster for humanity in the developed and developing world alike, yet the media and the scientific consensus ignores this peril.
The Climategate controversy revolves around whether warming has been real and why it has not persisted – but it misses the point.
Cycles are involved, not short-term trends, and many respected scientists, especially those in Russia and China, think that a cooling cycle is coming.
Eco fascism for all to see.Totally out in the open,the pretense is over.For the second winter in a row, Bay Area residents who burn wood, fire logs and pellets on high-pollution days run the risk of earning citations and fines from local air regulators.
Fines for burning on winter Spare the Air days - SFGate
this is getting out of hand
clearly there are not enough places available in the gender studies departments anymore... the spillover are eager to take on these meaningless jobs, much as their lives...For the second winter in a row, Bay Area residents who burn wood, fire logs and pellets on high-pollution days run the risk of earning citations and fines from local air regulators.
Fines for burning on winter Spare the Air days - SFGate
this is getting out of hand
If man made global warming turned out to be fake that would be great. I think that if for any reason you are happy about AGW being real, you probably don't understand how big a problem it is. It would certainly make peak oil policy much simpler to make because then we could just start burning more coal as the oil runs out.
Carbon trading is not inherent to the AGW theory. It is simply corrupt vested interests trying to take advantage of a crisis.But then again if we're going to drasticly change the world, it should be for the right reasons, not just to sell carbon credits under the guise of being Green and saving the planet (again assuming man made climate change is real).
"But do 'climategate' revelations justify the sceptics’ claims that this is “the final nail in the coffin” of global warming theory? Not at all. They damage the credibility of three or four scientists. They raise questions about the integrity of one or perhaps two out of several hundred lines of evidence."
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
...
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
All these things are big scams. Just because they're not in the media does not mean they are not scamming away.
"But do 'climategate' revelations justify the sceptics’ claims that this is “the final nail in the coffin” of global warming theory? Not at all. They damage the credibility of three or four scientists. They raise questions about the integrity of one or perhaps two out of several hundred lines of evidence."
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
...
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote