But you show favour with no rationale. The adjustments resulted in a trend that was twice as large (increase of 0.07C/decade - half the current trend). Wouldn't you argue that the sum of biases should be neutral?Secondly, I point to your observation that Christie and Spencer have 7 documented revisions. 3 down and 4 up. Now that is the type of distriubtion of revisions one would expect to see.
HadCRUt total station adjustments are 50/50 up and down. It's in the links I gave you.There is no inherent reason why 99% of the time the temperature trend gets revised up.
Far as I can see, what your saying is that UHI is not corrected for when it is, and that all other corrections are spurious. Until I see a comprehensive analysis that finds a significant difference between the resulting temp record and the official ones, I'm left wondering what the basis for the dispute is. Where is Stephen McIntyre's global temperature series?
Can you even find a thoroughly analysed global temperature record from a skeptic that shows significant differences GISS etc? I can link you to skeptics showing the opposite (again).