Register to Comment
Like Tree9010Likes
  1. #36871
    james5001 james5001 is offline
    james5001's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    9,930

    Quote Originally Posted by oneshotleft View Post
    Do you think if I posted a sentence that read "Any fool can do x" then proceeded to do x, in the same post, that one of the pro CAGW would comment on it?

    Do you have selective outrage because we disagree on this subject?
    This post doesn't deserve a constructive response.
    Sign in or Register Now to reply

  2. #36872
    oneshotleft oneshotleft is offline

    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    482

    Quote Originally Posted by james5001 View Post
    It doesn't profess to be one.
    Nor did mine. More double standard?
    Sign in or Register Now to reply

  3. #36873
    oneshotleft oneshotleft is offline

    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    482

    Quote Originally Posted by james5001 View Post
    This post doesn't deserve a constructive response.
    I see your intellectual honesty on display.
    Sign in or Register Now to reply

  4. #36874
    owedtojoy owedtojoy is offline
    owedtojoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    24,575


    As I write this the outside temperature is 13 degrees below zero Fahrenheit, and tomorrow morning’s Bus Stop Temperature promises to be about –25F windchill here in central Minnesota.

    Meanwhile my Twitter stream is polluted with climate science denialist tweets pointing out that it is too cold outside to believe in global warming, even though the entire land area of the United States, where this cold is being experienced as a cultural and physical phenomenon, is about one and half percent of the planet Earth, and the Northern Hemisphere has just experienced its fourth warmest January during the period known as “Since Records Began” which in this case is about 1880 to the present.



    Denying Climate Science in Multiple Dimensions – Greg Laden's Blog

    Sign in or Register Now to reply

  5. #36875
    owedtojoy owedtojoy is offline
    owedtojoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    24,575

    Quote Originally Posted by james5001 View Post
    This post doesn't deserve a constructive response.
    Even a computer illiterate non-scientist can track the temperature trend anywhere on the planet, but poor ould oneballnall can't.

    Even if he could, he would prefer his stupid ideology.
    Sign in or Register Now to reply

  6. #36876
    james5001 james5001 is offline
    james5001's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    9,930

    Quote Originally Posted by oneshotleft View Post
    Nor did mine. More double standard?
    Notice the use of the word 'more' in my post.

    I'm implying that the post I replied to is of the same standard as the ones previous to this by you on this thread.

    A subtle rebuke. But I am not surprised that you didn't find this subtlety, given your approach to this topic.
    Sign in or Register Now to reply

  7. #36877
    owedtojoy owedtojoy is offline
    owedtojoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    24,575

    Stoat/ William Connolley on:

    • Why are there people who seem hell-bent on denying anthropogenic global warming?;
    • What are the deniers trying to achieve?;
    • Why do they post comments on your article that totally defy not only science, but also common sense?


    The answers:

    1. One answer is: who cares?
    2. Apart from “the IPCC is wrong, and Al Gore is fat” they don’t really agree about anything.
    3. You don’t have to read septic blogs – or comments from septics – for very long to realise that they’re often quite confused between the science of GW and the political consequences.
    4. If you’re a bit of a nutso, and wander into the GW debate, you’re quite likely to spout some piece of drivel you’ve innocently picked up from some septic blog, and someone who clearly knows much more than you will then tell you “you’re spouting drivel that you’ve picked up from a septic blog”. On the other hand, if you wander over to, say, WUWT you can talk as much drivel as you like and no-one will care.
    5. A fairish segment of the denialism market has convinced itself that all climate science since Lamb is wrong, and all climatologists corrupt or stupid. And so they wander around re-inventing the wheel, badly
    6. How embarrassing. I totally forgot this category: those who are simply for hire.


    A reader writes: Why are there people who seem hell-bent on denying anthropogenic global warming? – Stoat
    Sign in or Register Now to reply

  8. #36878
    SirCharles SirCharles is offline
    SirCharles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    11,292

    Quote Originally Posted by oneshotleft View Post
    Says the man who just answered Trains claim:

    "Quote Originally Posted by Trainwreck:And the GLOBE hasn't warmed for nearly 20 years."



    With a video of Arctic Sea Ice.

    "You're still lying, braindreck.

    Newest NOAA Arctic Sea Ice Visualization"

    Are you sure you have the slightest clue what global means?
    Yep.





    => Effects of Global Warming - Signs Are Everywhere (National Geograaphic)

    => The Consequences of Global Warming (NRDC)

    => Effects of global warming - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    => Global Climate Change Effects (NASA)

    BTW. 70% of the planet are covered with oceans.

    Sign in or Register Now to reply

  9. #36879
    SirCharles SirCharles is offline
    SirCharles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    11,292

    Quote Originally Posted by oneshotleft View Post


    "Fig 1 shows raw lower temperature data (a), that with the El Nino removed (b) and that with El Nino and El Chichon and Pinatubo removed (c). Looking at 1c one sees that the lower atmosphere shows a standstill since 1993, that is 20 years! This is in itself a remarkable graph extending the ‘pause’ into the start of its third decade."


    Volcanoes And The
    Some "pause" indeed

    You're just a loser, but a terribly loud one therefore.
    Sign in or Register Now to reply

  10. #36880
    SirCharles SirCharles is offline
    SirCharles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    11,292

    Quote Originally Posted by RasherHash View Post
    What on Earth are you talking about
    He's talking about your signature, stupid
    Sign in or Register Now to reply

Sign in to CommentRegister to Comment