How much more would you pay for a passive House, let say a four bed urban terraced or semi 140 square meters on two or three floors as opposed to a house of the same size dating from 1970?
One of the key aspects is that in conventional housing the Heating ventilation losses for a house of 140 sqm with a volume of 350Cubic meters would typically loose 5Kw per our in ventilation losses this could be cut by 90% with ventilation heat revovery.
Heat losses through the floors walls roof would be cut to 10% of that of a 1970 uninsulated house with a U Value of 0.1
Will the market pay a premium for such houses to reflect superior energy efficiency and superior comfort levels?
Should the state continue to allow tax relief to landlords on non passive houses?



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote