Only saw this disaster when I was back home in April and climbed the Sugar Loaf. Couldn't figure out what the huge "thing" in Greystones was.Originally Posted by ShoutingIsLeadership
Should be torn down. But it never will be. Just left to ruin the area.
I confess that I do not see what good it does to fulminate against the English tyranny while the Roman tyranny occupies the palace of the soul. - James Joyce
To what extent is the current character of the town out of keeping with the character of the town as it was in the past?? Are you saying that dinosaurs roamed through the streets of Greystones as we know it today???
And once completed will this not, by definition, be an integral part of the "character of the town"?? An evolved character that shoutyleadery type forum commenters of the future can insist needs "defending"???
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Third Assessment Report: “long-term prediction of future climate states is not possible.”
The key word in your response is 'evolved', Tombo. This change was not evolutionary. The harbour jumped several stages of natural and logical development to become the monster I believe it now is. Many protested against this at the time, as they saw what it would become.
There's no doubt the harbour was rundown and in need of change, but this was not the next step in its change - in my opinion.
It's so big it looks like somewhere a ferry could easily dock
If you knew the history of this development, you'd realise that your guess isn't actually that far off.
4Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote