Quote Originally Posted by Húrin View Post
AGW is the scientifically preferred interpretation because it is the one that runs into the least conflict with observations.
Only someone ignorant of statistics would be so brazen to make a statement like that. More accurately, it is the one that has been employed to match the back data.

Are you familiar with the terms "flux adjustment" in the context of GCMs for example?

What about the empirical underpinning of the treatement of cloud feedback in GCMs?

In the words of someone more expert on these issues than any "climate scientist":

"Give me four parameters, and I can fit an elephant. Give me five, and I can wiggle its trunk".

John van Neumann
The inconvenient truth, as I have told you before and of which you remain in denial, it is the predictive ability of the model that provides proof of its effifacy. For that the Hypothesis is pants.