Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 46

Thread: Former Irish Times journalist John Gibbons on media coverage of climate change

  1. #21
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    142

    Quote Originally Posted by jmcc View Post
    A very strange interview. I thought the whole idea of journalism is to be skeptical and trying to provide a balanced view. This interview seems like a puff piece.

    Regards...jmcc
    ?!?!?!?!??!?!

    That's one of the main topics discussed in the interview - the idea that journalism is concerned with 'balance'. Most scientists are agreed. How does the media balance that? Put 95 climate scientists up against David Bellamy? Is the RTE Prime Time studio set up for that kind of panel?

  2. #22
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    5,545

    Quote Originally Posted by ForYourInfo View Post
    The point is that climate change appears to cause weather unpredictability. Therefore the two statements do not contradict each other, quite oppositely, extreme weather events such as unusual cold spells actually support the thesis.
    No, his point was unambiguous.

    Weather (which includes cold snaps and heavy rain) is not climate, except when he wants it to be.

    You people make me laugh

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

    Third Assessment Report: “long-term prediction of future climate states is not possible.

  3. #23
    Politics.ie Regular Destiny's Soldier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Milan
    Posts
    2,812

    John Gibbons had a regular following of Deniers (as well as avid warmers) in the Have your Say section of the Times.

    I have to say, I feel I may have contributed in some small way to his downfall.
    John latched himself on to the Global Warming bandwagon, and it's terrible when you've been proven to be wrong and so gullable.

    It's one thing to be a warmer, but to have a totally arrogant, intolerent, condescending, snooty tone to others of a different view, gave the IT a bad name.

    John, in my opinion had a predisposition for supporting a Planetary Government based on saving humainty from itself. There are too many of us etc etc went a headline in the Times.

    In the end John Gibbons started to mock the Deniers "Why debate facts with fools?"

    Have a look in the mirror John. You're in a corridor of mirrors, where all you can see is your own reflection.
    Cowardice asks the question - is it safe? Expediency asks the question - is it politic?
    Vanity asks the question - is it popular? But Conscience asks the question - is it right?
    And there comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular;but one must take it simply because it is right. -MLK

  4. #24
    Politics.ie Regular Panopticon's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    7,473

    Quote Originally Posted by jmcc View Post
    A very strange interview. I thought the whole idea of journalism is to be skeptical and trying to provide a balanced view. This interview seems like a puff piece.

    Regards...jmcc
    I basically agree with this. Gibbons is having lines and evidence fed to him by the interviewer. It reads like an interview with a Minister or a spokesman in a party magazine.

    If Gibbons objects to being featured on the same page as someone who disagrees with him, perhaps a newspaper is not the best medium to choose.

  5. #25
    Politics.ie Regular ManOfReason's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,696

    So the IT is finally rid of that twit. maybe there is hope for the IT yet. Journalistic integrity is more important that the 'coming climite crisis' or what ever is the current uber-liberal madness.

    Next up should be RTE's cancellation of that unquestioning crap that is 'Eco Eye'.
    Clicking an ad a day keeps Politics.ie in business.

  6. #26
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    22,408

    Quote Originally Posted by ForYourInfo View Post
    ?!?!?!?!??!?!

    That's one of the main topics discussed in the interview - the idea that journalism is concerned with 'balance'. Most scientists are agreed. How does the media balance that? Put 95 climate scientists up against David Bellamy? Is the RTE Prime Time studio set up for that kind of panel?
    Journalists rarely make any attempt to provide balance in that sense. They usually just write something that boils down to "Someone says X. Others disagree." - little or no attempt is made to indicate whether X is a mainstream theory opposed by a couple of cranks, or a crank theory opposed by nearly everyone.
    Never let the best be the enemy of the good.

  7. #27
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    1,702

    The purpose of journalism IMO is to tell the story of events that questions the narrative coming from governments and big business.
    "But do 'climategate' revelations justify the sceptics’ claims that this is “the final nail in the coffin” of global warming theory? Not at all. They damage the credibility of three or four scientists. They raise questions about the integrity of one or perhaps two out of several hundred lines of evidence."

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


    ...
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  8. #28
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Night of the Senses
    Posts
    6,608

    A good interview. I never realised there were so many sceptics in the media.
    "The perfect liberty they seek is the liberty of making slaves of other people." -- Abraham Lincoln


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  9. #29
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    22,408

    Quote Originally Posted by Almanac View Post
    A good interview. I never realised there were so many sceptics in the media.
    A compelling case for AGW, that.
    Never let the best be the enemy of the good.

  10. #30
    Politics.ie Regular cyberianpan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Wherever I can see
    Posts
    23,113

    Quote Originally Posted by imokyrok View Post
    Terrific article DC. Thanks for bringing it to our attention. So with Gibbons gone is there anyone with a clue writing about environmental issues in Ireland or are we stuck with oafs like Myers?
    Richard Tol is well worth reading, he has a global reputation as an economist studying environmental issues - and it is well deserved imo

    The Irish Economy Richard Tol

    cYp
    "Yawn , am I alive yet ?"

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Where's the Climate Change Bill John??
    By spidermom in forum Green Party
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 14th November 2009, 12:53 AM
  2. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 10th August 2009, 09:27 PM
  3. Replies: 27
    Last Post: 8th July 2009, 03:40 PM
  4. IT's John Gibbons not helping Greens
    By amblincork in forum Green Party
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: 15th June 2009, 11:06 PM
  5. Irish Times & exteme right-wing Polish Journalist?
    By CookieMonster in forum Media
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 24th April 2009, 12:10 AM