Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: Super Mozzies - Genetic Engineering

  1. #1
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Waterford
    Posts
    1,912

    Super Mozzies - Genetic Engineering

    According to this BBC News article, a genetically modified mosquito, syntethicly strengthened, could potentially be used to tackle the world's malaria problem.

    Research into modifying mosquito's has been on going for years.. Looking into ways of adapting Mosquito's DNA such that the modified creatures no longer carry the disease, with the ultimate goal of releasing a population of these engineered animals into the wild. The aim of which is to replace the existing "malaria carrying trait" held by the wild population.

    But according to this recent press release, they've created a stronger, more reselient mosquito to aid in establishing dominance of the disease free population.

    Strengtening the species will increase their global population as the more robust physique will enable them to thrive in new envioronments. Strengtening the species too much, could completely destablise population growth, creating a new nightmare for malaria ridden countries & potentially opening the door for swarms of the insect to thrive in our cold little country..

    Removing Malaria from the Mosquito would obviously be a good thing, and the pro's of rolling out this technology, may easily outweigh the con's.. Are these scientists taking a step too far?
    The one thing I know is I can't know anything else...

  2. #2
    Politics.ie Regular A_man_about_a_dog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    2,046

    The pros probably would out weigh the con's, true. But, I am still not 100% sure whether it would be ethically right to mess with the natural order of things.

    For example, if science got to the stage where we had cures for every potentially lethal disease in the world should we allow them to be used?
    It would undoubtedly be great for people who suffer from the diseases but it would also cause a massive increase in life expectancy aswell as the world population.
    -If I were to take a religious standpoint on it I would say that no we should not because God created the world, etc, and therefore God created the diseases for a reason, probably population control.
    -We could also look at it form the point of view that by messing with the current disease we have the potential to force the disease to mutate and form a stronger, tougher disease which would require years of further research to profile fully.

    With regards to only the Malaria case I was just wondering if there is any information on the chances of the new super- mosquito and the old malaria-filled mosquito interbreeding? Surely this would in turn lead to a Malaria filled super-mosquito?
    Economic Left/Right: -2.00
    Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.88

    Some people see things as they are and ask why? I dream things that never were and ask why not?
    G.B Shaw

  3. #3
    Politics.ie Regular Catalpa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Dublin West
    Posts
    27,429

    Maybe they should read up a bit on things first before proceeding any further...

    Here's a suggestion:

    http://www.literature.org/authors/shell ... nkenstein/
    Europa Conventus Delenda Est

  4. #4
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Axis Mundi
    Posts
    9,042

    Whilst I dont in principle have any opposition to genetic engineering, I think its way to soon to start tinkering with this sort of thing. The biosphere is incredibly complex and its all too easy to mess things up badly.

    I applaud the sentiment, but have grave reservations about it nonetheless.
    If I could mass-sterilise the planet, I would. Seriously.
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  5. #5
    Politics.ie Regular Catalpa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Dublin West
    Posts
    27,429

    Quote Originally Posted by The OD
    Whilst I dont in principle have any opposition to genetic engineering, I think its way to soon to start tinkering with this sort of thing. The biosphere is incredibly complex and its all too easy to mess things up badly.

    I applaud the sentiment, but have grave reservations about it nonetheless.
    Here's on they tried earlier in an attempt to wipe out a pest- and created an even bigger one!

    http://www.canetoadbattle.com/
    Europa Conventus Delenda Est

  6. #6
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Waterford
    Posts
    1,912

    Quote Originally Posted by A_man_about_a_dog
    With regards to only the Malaria case I was just wondering if there is any information on the chances of the new super- mosquito and the old malaria-filled mosquito interbreeding? Surely this would in turn lead to a Malaria filled super-mosquito?
    Thats the idea behind the research, i.e. to breed out the malaria carrying gene from the wild population using these modified insects..

    I was inaccurate with the title of this thread though, the BBC's wording had me off on a tangent!.. Having just read the paper in question.. The researchers involved haven't actually added anything to strengthen mosquito's, they've simply made a mosquito that won't succumb to malaria or similar parasites, meaning it won't get sick. Essentially they're just vaccinating the species genetically, meaning the modified insects won't be any stronger than their Malaria-Free cousins in the wild, but will be substantially more resilient than sick populations in the Malaria strongholds..
    The one thing I know is I can't know anything else...

  7. #7
    Politics.ie Regular A_man_about_a_dog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    2,046

    Quote Originally Posted by Simon.D
    Essentially they're just vaccinating the species genetically, meaning the modified insects won't be any stronger than their Malaria-Free cousins in the wild, but will be substantially more resilient than sick populations in the Malaria strongholds
    What if mosquitos from one region, say Asia, are carrying a minutely different strain of malaria to the ones in the Carribean. Surely in a situation such as that there is some potential for the 'vaccined' mosquitos to become infected?
    Economic Left/Right: -2.00
    Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.88

    Some people see things as they are and ask why? I dream things that never were and ask why not?
    G.B Shaw

  8. #8
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Drexciya
    Posts
    781

    I would prefer to see scientists working on ways to wipe out those irritating little b*stards, rather than downgrading them from a deadly pest to a pest.

    They probably form some vital link in the food chain though

    Goddamned mosquitoes, always one step ahead...

  9. #9
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    5,557

    Just thank your Lord these b'stards don't transmit AIDS.
    Imagine the human exodus from mosquito ridden countries to...well Ireland and a handful of other countries.
    Just 1 gram of cocaine destroys 4m2 of tropical rainforest. Give it up ya selfish b'stards.

  10. #10
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Somewhere up in the hills
    Posts
    2,701

    Any of you God freaks out there with a difficulty with this one? Surely the good Lord wouldn't approve of such a modification of His/Her work...

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. JJ Kelso Motor Engineering Works
    By eskerman in forum Transport
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 28th June 2009, 10:30 AM
  2. Science and Engineering Education Cuts Coming
    By Digout in forum Education & Science
    Replies: 62
    Last Post: 17th March 2009, 01:26 PM
  3. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 5th September 2008, 06:47 PM
  4. Replies: 70
    Last Post: 20th August 2008, 11:26 AM