Climategate: with business interests like these, can you trust the IPCC? No!

[Wakeupcall]

Climategate: with business interests like these are we really sure Dr Rajendra Pachauri is fit to head the IPCC?

Lets find out...

I’m quite sure that no one will in any wise have their faith in the integrity of the IPCC shaken by these revelations courtesy of the mighty Richard North.

North’s tribute to Dr Pachauri’s multifarious talents is so startling I think I shall have to quote it in full:

As reported by Reuters – with a slight correction: The head of the Asian Development Bank (ADP), Haruhiko Kuroda, warned governments that a failure to reach a climate deal in Copenhagen could lead to a collapse of the carbon market, which would hit efforts to deal with climate change make carbon traders very rich.

It helps of course to know that Mr Kuroda is best known in greenie circles for setting up the ADB Advisory Group on Climate Change – chaired by millionaire businessman Rajendra K. Pachauri, part-time chairman of the IPCC.

An interesting member of that Group is Dr Klaus Toepfer, Founding Director, Institute for Advanced Studies Climate, Earth System and Sustainability Sciences and former executive director of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). And it was UNEP, of course, which set up the IPCC – which now has as its part-time chairman millionaire businessman Rajendra K. Pachauri.

One other member is professor Hironori Hamanaka, Chair, Board of Directors, Institute of Global Environmental Strategies (IGES). The IGES claims to be “a research institute that conducts pragmatic and innovative strategic policy research to support sustainable development in the Asia-Pacific region.” It will come as no surprise, therefore, to learn that the organisation works very closely with TERI, whose Director-General is millionaire businessman Rajendra K. Pachauri.

Yet another is Ms Huguette Labelle, also a Board Member of the UN Global Compact organisation, the very same UN to which millionaire businessman Rajendra K. Pachauri belongs. Hilariously, Ms Labelle is Chair of Transparency International, the global civil society organisation “leading the fight against corruption.” TI’s mission “is to create change towards a world free of corruption.”

The Board also includes professor Jeffrey D. Sachs, Director, The Earth Institute at Columbia University. This is the same Earth Institute which set up the Climate-Risk Center, inviting millionaire businessman Rajendra K. Pachauri to become its first Board Chairman.

One other interesting character is Dr. Emil Salim, an adviser to Indonesia’s President on environment and sustainable development issues. But he is also a member of APFED – the Asia-Pacific Forum for Environment and Development. One of its major activities is sponsoring the “Partnership Initiatives for Knowledge Network and Capacity Building” – in conjunction with TERI as a major partner, the Director General of which is millionaire businessman Rajendra K. Pachauri.

And last but not least is Professor Dadi Zhou, Director General (Emeritus) of the Energy Research Institute, which of course is otherwise known as TERI, the Director General of which is millionaire businessman Rajendra K. Pachauri.

No longer, it seems, does Rome hold a pre-eminent position. In this brave new world of climate change and sustainable development, all roads lead to Rajendra K. Pachauri.

I can say nothing more than WOW.

Particularly interesting...

<Mod> Text removed. </Mod>

It seems to me that everyone working in relation to the IPCC has soem sort of hidden agenda or past, present and future. The next few months, regardless of what these eco-goons try to tell us will be very interesting. The world is on fire about Climategate... The longer the main stream media hold it down the bigger the end explosion will be and rightfully too.

Nevertheless, as Christopher Booker has noted elsewhere...

<Mod> Text removed. </Mod>

Ahh good old TATA, its ironic that they bought and now produce landrover. Landrover must = green?... Ahhhhh anyway back on post...

As Booker reported...

<Mod> Text removed. </Mod>

Indeed... This is just the TIP OF THE ICEBERG in relation to the absolute destruction this carbon game will cause within human society all over the world. Read the quoted text about the Tata example...

The real gain to Corus...

<Mod> Text removed. </Mod>

Will this make any difference at all to the quantities of plant food – sorry, deadly, planet-destroying CO2 – pumped into the atmosphere? Not at all, as Booker goes on to explain:

But this is only half the story...

<Mod> Text removed. </Mod>

This is the real reason why so many big businessmen, bankers, politicians, scientists – led, of course, by Al Gore – are backing stiffer, pan-global governmental legislation on carbon emissions. Because there are such stupendous quantities of money to be made.

Last year, on official figures...

<Mod> Text removed. </Mod>

The true essense of totalitarian control. The NWO or just pure simple greed for power and money? The funny thing is that the silly ordinary brainwashed fools who support the eco-warrior agenda have absolutely no frikkin comprehension beyond their very own eyebrows as to what it is they are supporting.

One thing is for certain...

<Mod> Text removed. </Mod>

Conflict of what? Interest? Well if you want to pay me interest early I might just lodge a few billion worth of carbon 'credits' with you if you can come up with a 'model' fake or otherwise that will help (now US BOTH) make some extra money, like billions. If you can manage to top it to trillions I will make you the next president of........ Annnnnyway...

Oh, and while he’s mulling over that question, here are a few more of Dr Pachauri’s business interests listed below, as disclosed by Business Week.

Dr. Rajendra Kumar Pachauri...

<Mod> Text removed. </Mod>

Indeed.... Absolutely.... Indeed....

Ends.

Climategate: with business interests like these are we really sure Dr Rajendra Pachauri is fit to head the IPCC? – Telegraph Blogs

<Mod> Please do not post copyright-protected material to the site. A link and a short extract are generally sufficient. </Mod>

<Mod> This thread has been merged with "Head of IPCC up to his neck in it". </Mod>

<Mod> This thread has been merged with "Exclusive: Lead Author Admits Deleting Inconvenient Opinions From IPCC Report". </Mod>

[TommyO'Brien]

Oh good. Another nutty flatearther thread!

[Wakeupcall]

Oh good. Another nutty flatearther thread!

You read all that 30 seconds after the OP?

TOMMY O BRIEN AS MOST PEOPLE ON THIS FORUM CAN CONCUR, YOU ARE A COMPLETE AND UTTER FOOL with a BIT OF GOBSHYTE.

Dumb troll that you are Tommyboy.

Post something that requires a brain cell to create. I know this request may seem like mount improbable to your little mind, but please, for the sake of humanity, TRY.

[Son_Of_The_Republic]

Oh good. Another nutty flatearther thread!

You should simply make that your sig. Think of the CO2 you'll stop expending now that you no longer need to reply to every thread in exactly the same manner.

[Destiny's Soldier]

Oh good. Another nutty flatearther thread!

Oh Good. Another thread where Insider2007 aka Notdevsson, aka Tommy O'Brien, shows how little he has to contribute except snide, vacuous comments.

Tommy, why do you continue to change you're pseudonym? Do you have so much self loathing that you inexorably disown your own thoughts and creations?

Perhaps you're just a paranoid skitzophrenic.

[Wakeupcall]

Well someone who controls an organisation which yields so much power over every human beings life needs to be impartial. The fact that this IPCC goon is so heavily involved with profit makes me think that the people supporting the green agenda based on the cr@p these people spout need their heads examined.

[Wakeupcall]

In relation to "hide the decline"

But what, exactly, was the “trick”? As the Daily Mail reports, “All [Jones] had to do was cut off Briffa’s inconvenient data at the point where the decline started, in 1961, and replace it with actual temperature readings, which showed an increase.” Below is the graph that was eventually included in the IPCC’s 2001 science assessment. And it shows that Jones’s trick was successful: Briffa’s line in green is cutoff and obscured by the other lines. (Courtesy of McIntyre at Climate Audit [Welcome to our new home!])



http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/17948

[Tombo]

In relation to "hide the decline"

But what, exactly, was the “trick”? As the Daily Mail reports, “All [Jones] had to do was cut off Briffa’s inconvenient data at the point where the decline started, in 1961, and replace it with actual temperature readings, which showed an increase.” Below is the graph that was eventually included in the IPCC’s 2001 science assessment. And it shows that Jones’s trick was successful: Briffa’s line in green is cutoff and obscured by the other lines. (Courtesy of McIntyre at Climate Audit [Welcome to our new home!])



Hide The Decline - Climategate

Nothing to see here. Move along now...

[Wakeupcall]

Nothing to see here. Move along now...

Care to explain?

[Tombo]

Care to explain?

What is behind the curtain is private. No peeking.