The same Joe Trippi who is a long time Democratic Party strategist who has worked with Howard Dean, John "Lovely hair" Edwards, Ted Kennedy and Walter Mondale. All good guys by accounts. And given his background and the list of those he has worked it it doesn't really fit in with the nasty right wing image you're trying so very hard to paste onto Ganley, does it?
As for soundbites, if you've ever seen Ganley speak at a public meeting or met him you will know that one thing he doesn't do well is soundbites. Why say one catchy phrase when you can talk for 20 minutes.
Yes, a campaign which he won by reaching out to the voters who were long ignored by Livingston using what's been branded a "doughnut strategy". He reached out to an ignored element of his candidates constituency and it worked. Obama did much the same thing. In Europe there are three countries who made a decision which was ignored, a plethora of countries who were given a promise which was never honoured and the rest never even consulted... I think the "doughnut strategy" might work again!They also have Lynton Crosby, the man reputed to have got rightwinger Howard through three difficult elections and who recently ran Boris's victorious campaign against Ken in London.
Yes, because nobody would ever think of using any dodgy tools against Ganley, you know, oh... like say spending almost half a million euro on commissioning a ridiculous "brass eye" like investigation.Crosby is noted for using negative campaigning - check the Libertas posters and attacks on individual politicians - including push polling and every mucky technique in the book.
But you know what, a bit of negative campaigning isn't a bad thing, assuming it's true, but what is bad is using taxpayer's money to do it.
You've been around Europe asking, have you? You've no idea how many members or supporters Libertas has. The Libertas Lisbon campaign was funded from within the state, where as the Libertas european election campaign is funded from a pool of 27 states and an electorate of around 300 million people, more than 100 times bigger. And as I said above, from countries who voted and were ignored, countries who were told they would be given a vote and then weren't and from countries who were never asked to vote at all on the EU constitution. Couple that with the moderate message Libertas is promoting throughout Europe, on of increased democracy and of reform of wasteful spending, it's hardly surprising that Libertas could easily build support though Europe. Then add to that again our candidates; business leader, academics, former MEPs, former Prime Ministers, nurses, and ordinary people it's really not that shocking that we should be doing well. And really the campaigns are only just starting.Neither of these people come cheap. I was sceptical about the amount of money said to be spent by Ganley on the Lisbon Treaty Referendum, but many millions are being spent
on the campaign across Europe, including inducements to people to switch allegiance and run for Libertas. Surely this must be the most expensive campaign being run by any group in Europe, and by a party without more than a handful of members.
You're showing an extraordinary lack of faith in people, you're not alone in this as a few other members of this board have exhibited this too.Given the disarray of FF and the complacency and confusion of other parties, I would not write off Libertas too easily.
Just looking at this site shows that people are frightened and angry and that some may be open to voting for a demogogic right wingers, nicely dressed up and holding their cards close to their chest as Libertas do.
But I'm not like you, I have faith in democracy and faith in the people to listen to the arguments, listen to the candidates, see the nonsense for what it is and vote for the people they feel are right for them and I think that in many places around Europe that person will be a Libertas candidate. Parties like FF having made a hames of things will only be a small part of our success.



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote