Listening to Q&A last night it was easy to tell many of the audience (and that journalist) had never ran an election campaign.
There was much scorn poured upon political donations and the myriad ways they can trickle through into accounts..
But it got me thinking. Running any kind of campaign costs money. A candidate with no access to capital has to run a campaign at the same level as the multi-millionaire to have a chance. There are no spending limits at local elections. Even in GE the limits are quite high if an individual is expected to raise the finance themselves. And there is all the subterfuge to spend money before the election is called. Basically the more money spent on campaigning the better chance of success. This has been proven in international studies also.
At the moment the system completly discriminates in favour of wealthy individuals. Is the only hope for a poor individual to solicit/accept donations from whomever they can attract? As it would take a hell of a lot of table quizzes to make a war chest.
Or how is a candidate supposed to raise this money?!



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote