Dasayev posted:
I disagree, in terms of economy and society, a city is considerably different to the surronding country. Thats why I would syphen off Belfast.Perhaps your idea of a Belfast city state could be extended to include all of Antrim and Down, and called something like East Ulster. This may help unionists console themselves with the idea of a United Ireland.
Munion Posted:
We do need less govt as an end in itself. The state in and of itself is not inherently evil as libertarians would have you beleive. What we need is accountable govt on a small scale where no-one has too much power.What's needed is less government and not more.
Scrap the notion of county councils and implement a dozen or so regions based on geographical logic and not history.
Scrap the pointless Seanad.
Replace the position of County/City Manager with a directly electable (ie. actually accountable) position of Mayor/Governor for each region.
Scrap the stupid idea of 3/4/5 seater constituencies whose boundaries have to be constantly drawn and redrawn. Instead each of the dozen or so regions becomes a constituency and a balance is struck between direct candidate votes and party list votes ala. Scotland.
Total Elected Officials
1 President
166 TDs
12 Regional Governors
X Amount of Regional Councillors
MacEHaVelly Posted:
First place in Ireland where the tri-colour was raised, 1798 and besides, I'm from there. Do I need any other reason?...Leinster state....with Enniscorthy as capital.................
fergalr posted:
I disagree, look at Germany, they have a federalised structure for a unitary *nation* because it was traditionally divided politically, as was Ireland. Even areas which never had a single state such as Sachsen Anhalt got there own state post '90. This misconception that Dublin would steam ahead while Connacht would rot is a myth. Look again to Germany, Baden Wurtenburg is one of the richest provinces and one of the smallest and most remote. Yet before the 1870 unification it was far away from Germany's economic dynamo in the ruhr region.I've always thought that the only way for Ireland to work if reunited would be in a federation, with either NI as is or the province of Ulster as one state and the rest as the other. The 26 counties have had 80+ years of political union as a unitary state, and that rarely changes in countries, unless for ethnic reasons (Spain and Belgium..).
Plus, if you divide it up too much, then Dublin will be far and away the richest state and Connaught the worst off.
Munion posted:
The collection of taxes could still be done on a national level with the re-distribution in a block payment by central govt like is being done in the North. County and provincial boundaries may make no logical sense but in the words of Sir Francis Bacon "No worldly thing is more dear to men than their name". I agree with you about the greater Dublin area, and the need for a greater Limerick and cork areas.As Dublin is the largest population centre it will obviously be the richest region as it will supply the greatest tax revenue.
Lose the English enforced idea of counties they by and large make little sense. Have you ever studied the county boundary between Carlow & Kilkenny and wonder wtf it is the way it is? It makes no logical sense as county boundaries rarely follow obvious geographical boundaries like rivers or mountains.
Why should the political region of Dublin stop where it is and not encompass what everyone these days regards as the Greater Dublin Metropolitan area? It would make far more sense from an administration point of view. Think of road building, water supply, refuse collection etc.
Why should Longford and Wexford be included in the same political administration area?
Why should a significant part of the Limerick Metropolitan area be located & administered by Clare CC?



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote