Wonderful analysis.
You might want to check this again. SF went up by 6 and 7% in the Tralee and Listowel electoral areas and performed a lot stronger than they did in 2004. Topped the poll in the Listowel area and Listowel TC as well as taking Labour's only seat on the latter.Ferris: strong enough locally, though the party made absolutely no headway in the council elections (critical in shoring up his support). Labour did quite actually and are his biggest threat.
This about sums up your entire post.(Eoin Cullinane) Waterford: no chance.![]()
Party constituency polls aren't done for the purpose of tailoring policies - they're done to establish where a party's strong and weak areas are, to guide campaign strategy, to establish whether support from HQ is necessary or worthwhile in order to gain or hold a seat, etc. Policy doesn't come into it.
"Elite - a small superior group; esp one that has a power out of proportion to its size." (Oxford English Dictionary)
The majority cannot therefore be the elite.
It doesn't really work like that in SF. Canvassing is about meeting the voters and everyone else, trying to counter the endless bad media by being available to constituents whether they support the party or not, and putting forward the Republican view.
Very little opinion polling is done outside of canvassing.
Whether this is a good thing or a bad thing I don't know, but it's the way SF prioritise things.
... which won't be happening.
Labour is largely a party of middle class teachers, librarians and social workers. They won't be switching to SF.
If SF have anything going for them, perhaps they really are a party of the working class, or the underclass. Their best hope is to get people out who never voted before.
Although take away the whole Northern Ireland thing*, and what have you left? A party that throws left wing shapes but don't have much credibility.
*which of course you do. All parties have signed up to Belfast/St. Andrews.
If there is a future, it will be Green.