Is it the school itself, by raising money through fees, or is it the Dept of Education, or is it a combination of both?
Is it the school itself, by raising money through fees, or is it the Dept of Education, or is it a combination of both?
In private primaries, the teacher's salaries are funded entirely from fees.
My political compass
Economic Left/Right: 0.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.36
Sisters are always right!
Its actually impossible to state one way or the other. Private schools receive huge amounts of public money. That could all go toward infrastructure or it could supplement the wage big of the school where fees alone fall short.
You would need a detailed breakdown of each schools finances to determine what money is spent on what.
Voters don't decide issues, they decide who will decide issues.
George Will
No, what you are referring to there is fee paying secondary schools. Standalone fee paying primary schools receive no subvention from the Department of Education whatsoever. There only Government 'support' would be their charitable status which means that contributions to them are not taxed. Those private primary schools which form a junior school to a fee paying secondary school obviously benefit from the infrastructure of the secondary school though.
In the traditional fee-paying secondary schools, the salaries of the bulk of teachers are paid by the department. However, if the school needs to hire teaching staff over and above their departmental allocation, they can offer contracts to further teachers and pay them from the fees income.
Have you read my blog?
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
as quoted by Sarah Carey in the
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
on 12/08/10
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.