Recently, there has been widespread debate in our schools and classrooms in regards to the usefulness and necessity of guidance counsellors, so do you think was it a good thing the FF motion calling for a reversal of Budget decisions affecting guidance counsellor posts was defeated?
Obviously FG's Lawlor blamed it on FF, claiming all the aces had been removed from the playing deck by the previous government, another FGer, Mary Mitchell O'Connor equally washed her hands of it claiming the government was only in 20 percent control of the education budget, stating the other four fifths went on salaries and costs. (Which incidentally made my stomach jump).
Those on the left are crying foul and believe those from the weaker sections of society will suffer most with the FG/Lab cuts to education. Our very own Ming Flanagan even claimed suicides will increase due to these decisions, warning TDs not to cry crocodile tears when our young are throwing up the rope due to their inability to connect with the only solace many of our children from broken homes can face - a guidance counsellor.
FF's Timmy Dooley was even afforded applause and praise from current guidance counsellors from the gallery for his supportive words before being silenced by Enda Ken...*cough*..sorry, Cathaoirleach. SF's Sean Crowe, along with the Socialists have lambasted the decisions claiming the disappearance of guidance counsellors coincides with the alarming rise in the rate of suicides, self-harm and depression among the Irish youth. Crowe went even further saying such cuts may even breach Section 9c of the 1998 Education Act, that states 'students have access to appropriate guidance to assist them in their educational and career choices'.
So what ye think?



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote