I respect your opinion.
I would be anti-Nama myself , in everything I've read up to now.
As a person with an average knowledge and interest in Nama , I have to say that Lenihen seemed to know what he was talking about , seemed to have thought about the options , and had good answers for most of the questions put to him.
I was impressed and somewhat reassured in him anyhow.
The overall competency of the goverment is terrible , but if they can keep NAMA seperate it may not be all bad.
I think when your the guy in the hot seat , its understandable he would have more concern over market reaction and the rest of it.
He seemed reasonable to me , and I think if Richard Bruton was making these decisions , ( which would be my 1st Preference ) , he would end up coming close to Lenihen's way of thinking.



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote