Thanks, uniquare, for going to the trouble of getting some sources. I don't know if there are others which might provide evidence of a more sustained IPU response that might not be attributable to the trouble coming down the tracks from the McCarthy Commission, or evidence from more than a handful of pharmacists. I'm prepared for the sake of argument to accept that your sources are a sample. (I'm not going to ask you to go on a fishing expedition through the press over the last 5 or 10 golden years of windfall earnings for pharmacists and other professions.)
It is not my intention to be difficult or disrespectful, but for instance you can get individual solicitors criticising problematic aspects of the legal profession (e.g. problems with self-regulation, ethics, rogue solicitors, conveyancing fees, and indeed the nature of conveyancing itself). You'll even get Ken Murphy from the Law Society coming on Sunday morning radio and being quite reasonable about issues like these. However, in the meantime the vast majority of the profession carried on carrying on coining it in as best they could.
I'm afraid I have a similar non-credulous view of other professions. There are for sure individual pharmacists who would feel ethically disposed enough to their clients to spread the good word on generic drugs to whoever in the public is willing to listen. But as far as the IPU goes, if they're not pursuing the Irish government in the courts for their restrictive agreement with the pharma industry, you'll forgive me if I take their actual lower level protestations with a grain of salt.
In the heel of the hunt, professional bodies act for their members' interests. I just don't believe they wanted to rock the boat on all that lovely lolly going through the cash registers.



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote