LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksHow would that be better or cost less? (Thats meant as an honest question).Originally Posted by BodyofEvidence
How would that be better or cost less? (Thats meant as an honest question).
If there two items were in the NAMA plan I'd support it but i've got my doubts and without them NAMA is a totally different scheme.
Will the GP vote for NAMA if these two changes are not included?
The banks are fooked!
They need to be put into liquidation.
Why should the state "take them into care" when the state could set up clean new banks from scratch?
"Always do right. This will gratify some people and astonish the rest." Mark Twain
“When a government is dependent upon bankers for money, they and not the leaders of the government control the situation, since the hand that gives is above the hand that takes. Money has no motherland; financiers are without patriotism and without decency; their sole object is gain.” Napoléon Bonaparte
SPN - you've postsed a credible alternative there. Is it on the cards for discussion within the party?
Seeing as all the Aces are in the Green Party hands now, why isn't this solution or one like it demanded?
“A healthy social life is found only, when in the mirror of each soul the whole community finds its reflection, and when in the whole community the virtue of each one is living”
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
he doesnt do questions, so dont bother asking
This is one option that is being discussed internally.
I would imagine that NAMA will still be the solution, but it will be made more transparent and accountable.
But I could be wrong.
"Always do right. This will gratify some people and astonish the rest." Mark Twain
“When a government is dependent upon bankers for money, they and not the leaders of the government control the situation, since the hand that gives is above the hand that takes. Money has no motherland; financiers are without patriotism and without decency; their sole object is gain.” Napoléon Bonaparte
Reply With Quote