Theft implies previous ownership (property) therefore the statement is self-refuting.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
: :
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Quick question : If the Socialist Party were in power, would people still own their own houses, or would nationalisation extend to everything?
I have read into this. And I am not a landlord. So I dont really see how my property is theft sarah.
Lol, I'm trying to start a conversation and I KNEW I'd attract you.
I guess it all depends on how you look at property. I myself (though I haven't come to a concrete decision) would be inclined to look on property as anything you own which past that which is necessary for a decent standard of living that others are dying without. For example, having 3 acres of a back garden is theft when there are others starving for lack of food/land to grow it on.
Definitely, I would view ownership of the means of production as theft.
sarahj = Troll
Are you even aware of the definition of a troll?
"In Internet slang, a troll is someone who posts controversial, inflammatory, irrelevant, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum or chat room, with the primary intent of provoking other users into an emotional response[1] or to generally disrupt normal on-topic discussion"
Now, having started my own thread for this issue, I don't qualify as a troll.
You, however, have self-defined yourself as a troll by posting an irrlevant message to disrupt normal on-topic discussion.
Troll.